MG Sports Cars

engine swaps and other performance upgrades, plus "factory" and Costello V8s

Go to Thread: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicLog In


spycarrussell
Russell Levine

(15 posts)

Registered:
09/24/2009 07:24AM

Main British Car:


Engine height advice
Posted by: spycarrussell
Date: May 25, 2011 12:17AM

Hi all. As I follow along with the various posts on a nearly daily basis, my own MGBV8 has sat idle for a few years, but I'm ready to get my hands dirty again. But, I sorely need some advice.

I started with a '76 convertible into which I installed an engine/tranny combo out of a (1980, I think) TR8. I purchased the Rover drivetrain from a well known specialist from Massachusetts who shall remain unnamed.

Included with my purchase were motor mounts, block hugger headers, and a tranny cross member which had to be modified to fit, and eventually did. One of the bigger hurdles was getting the alternator mounted lower than the engine so that the package was relatively compact and somewhere near fitting under the unmodified hood.

The 3.5 motor came modified with what I'm told is a Buick intake manifold and an early sixties Rochester 4GC carb, identified over the phone by Mark of D&D (very helpful, by the way). Herein lies the problem, the carb top barely clears the hood, with absolutely NO room for an air filter, and I really don't want to modify the hood for clearance.

Mark at D and D suggests I revisit the engine mounts to see if the motor can be dropped, but the block hugger headers JUST clears the sheet metal buldge in the engine bay. I don't see any way that the situation can be improved, considering he tells me that this is a low intake and carb combo.

I am certain that many of you have been faced with similar issues and was hoping for a guiding light, as it were.

Is there anything I can do other than possibly changing to different (through the fender) headers and modifying the motor mounts to get this motor to clear the hood?

Any and all suggestions would be appreciated.

-Russell


flitner
John Fenner
Miami Fl
(168 posts)

Registered:
03/11/2010 10:58AM

Main British Car:
1972 MGB 350 CHEVY

Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: flitner
Date: May 25, 2011 06:37AM

Would you be able to shorten the headers to where they are pulled closer to the flange and gain an 1/8" per side or more that might allow a considerable drop in height.
Just a guess?
BTW a picture is worthy for the best ideas!!


deltadave
dave plumley
unionville TN
(69 posts)

Registered:
10/24/2010 08:21PM

Main British Car:
1953 MG TD Chevy 350

authors avatar
Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: deltadave
Date: May 25, 2011 09:54AM

I have a TD, but had a problem with the width of the engine. The headers drop outside the frame and are hand made from a set of old used ones. One good thing is the exhaust heat is outside the frame and not in the cockpit. I'm using a very small 50 AMP alternator from an atv on my own mounts. The point is, there is always a way, if you just stand back and take a look from a different angle. The Factory Five Cobra kit turns the Ford stock manifolds around and the exhaust exits in front of the engine into the side pipes. I do recomend the engine be as low as possible. Hope this helps.

http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c395/davedeltadog/mg/pict0669.jpg



http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c395/davedeltadog/mg/PICT0620-1.jpg


roverman
Art Gertz
Winchester, CA.
(3188 posts)

Registered:
04/24/2009 11:02AM

Main British Car:
74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L

Re: Engine height advice, just low enough
Posted by: roverman
Date: May 25, 2011 02:48PM

Russell, I "think" the Offy , single plane 4bbl. manifold is lower. Edelbrock ? As a last resort, you could mount "sidedraft" carb, aimed towards firewall, similar to BL's MGB GT V8 build. Obviously, you don't want the sump of the pan, below the bottom of x-member,(disaster) ! Good Luck, roverman.


spycarrussell
Russell Levine

(15 posts)

Registered:
09/24/2009 07:24AM

Main British Car:


Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: spycarrussell
Date: June 12, 2011 01:09AM

Thanks everyone for your responses.

Many here have utilized "drop base" air filters, presumably like the K&N ones at this link:
[www.knfilters.com]

I've never actually seen one of these in person. I assume even dropping the base there must be some height above the carb chokes to provide inlet air, thereby still raising the total engine height, right? Can anyone tell me how much these add to the top of the carb height? (My carb just clears the hood with no cleaner)

Thanks


rficalora
Rob Ficalora
Willis, TX
(2764 posts)

Registered:
10/24/2007 02:46PM

Main British Car:
'76 MGB w/CB front, Sebring rear, early metal dash Ford 302

authors avatar
Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: rficalora
Date: June 12, 2011 07:50AM

Drop bases come with varying amounts of drop but you are right, you can't drop it below the chokes. With a drop base that gets air cleaner cover as low as you can get it & still clear the chokes, you probably need about 3/4-1" more to have a gap for air to get in & for the cover, nut, etc. If you're using a 3" filter element now, you can switch to 2"; that'll help. And, I've even heard of people modifying the chokes to gain another 1/4" or so -- you don't get full choke that way. The folks I know who've done that live in moderate climates; don't know if that'd work if it gets really cold where you are.


britcars
Phil Ossinger
New Brunswick, Canada
(346 posts)

Registered:
02/02/2009 07:58PM

Main British Car:
1977 MGB Roadster, Rover 3.5 ADVENTURE BEFORE DEMENTIA!

authors avatar
Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: britcars
Date: June 12, 2011 02:36PM

Not sure of the exact amount of clearance between the carb and your hood (carb top barely clears the hood), but would a remote filter work? Likely would have to be a custom build.
DSC03582.JPG



MGBV8
Carl Floyd
Kingsport, TN
(4514 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 11:32PM

Main British Car:
1979 MGB Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: MGBV8
Date: June 12, 2011 08:15PM

I'm with Mark, revisit the engine mounts. The closer the engine to the firewall, the more hood clearance for the air cleaner. I can barely get my index finger between the passenger head & the firewall. Glen Towery pioneered the "A/C mounts" that sets the engine farther back. Makes all the difference.

The stock Buick/Olds intake manifold and an Edelbrock/Carter carb has been regarded for years as THE low profile combo. Not measured a Rochester carb myself, though.

The block hugger headers will be very close. I can get a couple of sheets of paper between my headers & the fender wells. ;)


302GT
Larry Shimp

(241 posts)

Registered:
11/17/2007 01:13PM

Main British Car:
1968 MGB GT Ford 302 crate engine

authors avatar
Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: 302GT
Date: June 18, 2011 09:32AM

Glen Towery has suggested that the carb mounting base on the manifold can be angle milled to tilt the air filter forward to provide more hood clearance.

I did this on my Ford 302. I also removed the choke plate entirely (on my Demon carb) to allow the air cleaner to sit lower. I left the electric choke in place to provide a cold fast idle and this works fine, I have driven the car in zero degree weather with this set up after a 30 second warm up. Starting is easy, just pump the gas once, and crank without touching the accelerator. The nearly closed throttle acts just like a choke for starting purposes.


scot abbott
scot abbott

(26 posts)

Registered:
01/30/2008 06:03PM

Main British Car:


Re: Engine height advice
Posted by: scot abbott
Date: July 08, 2011 01:47PM

A question to explore a different direction....

I'm quite familiar with the 60 degree GM V6 installations, and some have similar issues. The TBI setup doesnt fit easily, the 2.8 and 3.1 efi setups just barely fit, once one mounts the throttle body inverted. Also, the air plenums are usually milled to give a llittle extra room. However, the 3.4 V6 air plenum is about 1 1/2 inches low and fits like a dream.
Is there a simple fuel injection setup for this motor? They can be much lower ( and the engine runs better, gives lower emissions, better gas mileage, etc) and avoid all these 'challenges'.


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.