|
don-ho Don Prince Atlanta GA (13 posts) Registered: 06/02/2011 10:13PM Main British Car: 1973 RD 302 in progress |
engine angle
Hello all, I am at the point in my 302 conversion where I need to determine the proper height of my T5 aft mount. I need advice on the angle of the engine (front to back). Is there a correct or desirable angle? I think I read somewhere that a 4 degree slope is optimal, but I have no idea where I heard this or if it is even true. Also is this angle measured with the car in a true level position or measured from a loaded driving position? Thanks in advance for any ideas/help, Don P.
|
|
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1331 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: engine angle
The angle of the engine isn't nearly as important as it is to match that angle to the pinion angle of the differential so that the drive shaft runs smoothly. This site has all the information on setting up a drive line, [www.iedls.com]
If you haven't installed the rear housing yet you can set the engine to where it fits the best and then match the rear to that angle when you make up the brackets for it. |
|
don-ho Don Prince Atlanta GA (13 posts) Registered: 06/02/2011 10:13PM Main British Car: 1973 RD 302 in progress |
Re: engine angle
Thanks for the quick responses. I currently have the shortened 8.8 bolted into the car, but I have not yet welded it to the spring perches, thus I can still rotate the diff. Bill, is it safe to assume that matching the angle of the T5 flange to the differential flange will then make the pinion and transmission angles parallel (both being 90 degrees to the flanges)? As you suggested it would make it a little easier to move my transmission a bit and then match my differential to the T5. Am I also safe in assuming, (yes I know what happens when you assume), that all of this should be done on level ground with the car loaded in a normal driving condition? Thanks again.....Don Prince
|
|
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (3524 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: engine angle
Usually there is not a lot of leeway to adjust the engine angle. Once you set the engine as low as it will go in the engine bay (about 1/4" clearance everywhere is good if you can get it) and raise the tailshaft enough that it and the driveshaft universal joint will clear the welded in crossmember, you're pretty well done because there isn't a whole lot of room above the tranny anyway and what is there is needed for access to the shifter bolts. Plus, any higher and bellhousing clearance starts to get tight. What room there is, probably isn't enough to change the engine angle more than a degree. If you get your pinion within 1/2 degree with the car on the wheels you're good.
Jim |
|
ex-tyke Graham Creswick Chatham, Ontario, Canada (688 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 11:17AM Main British Car: 1976 MGB Ford 302 |
Re: engine angle
Quote:Although I agree in principal, some intake designs won't allow that. Case in point for my Edelbrock 302 Performer manifold, the engine carb plane is at about 7 degrees to horizontal which means that I'd have to have a 7 degree power angle to get the carb level. As it is, my installed engine is at about 2 3/4 degrees tail down which results in the carb tilted forward. The good news is that it doesn't affect performance any and actually helps hood clearance. |
|
don-ho Don Prince Atlanta GA (13 posts) Registered: 06/02/2011 10:13PM Main British Car: 1973 RD 302 in progress |
Re: engine angle
Thanks again for all the advice. IEDS.com was very educating, and I believe had the jist of what I was looking for. I have indeed modified my front crossmember as low as I feel I can go (chrome bumper crossmember). So the front of the engine is pretty well set. But it seems I have about an 1" of a height window to set the aft T5 mount (I'm not sure how many degrees that equals). I plan on measuring everything out tomorrow. I know that with the spring perches not yet welded to the rear end, and engine angle not yet set, that this is my one and only chance to get things right. Hope I get it right the first time. Thanks again.....Don Prince
|
|
|
|
kill r b Dann Wade West Carrollton, Ohio (34 posts) Registered: 02/16/2012 07:57PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB ROADSTER 3500 V6 |
Re: engine angle
I can't remember if I posted this yet. I can't seem to find it so here it is again. Seems like a good place to post it.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2012 09:24PM by kill r b. |
|
kill r b Dann Wade West Carrollton, Ohio (34 posts) Registered: 02/16/2012 07:57PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB ROADSTER 3500 V6 |
Re: engine angle
Hmmm, I'm trying to post a photo of an engine leveler I drew but I can't get it to work. It's a simple MS paint drawing. What gives anyone? Ok I edited this post. I finally got it.
Dann Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/09/2012 09:47PM by kill r b. |
|
kill r b Dann Wade West Carrollton, Ohio (34 posts) Registered: 02/16/2012 07:57PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB ROADSTER 3500 V6 |
Re: engine angle
OK, I think I got it. This is a device for those who are setting up an engine and making their own motor mounts.You may find you have to cut off your old engine mounts but you would anyway if you were doing a swap. I didn't draw the T angle close to the frame because I didn't have any idea how close you can get it. Make this thing in pairs and hook the chain between them and place the chain under the engine near the front and secure it some way to the engine for more control. You can adjust the engine up or down or pitch the engine CW or CCW. Use small handle jack to get the correct angle to match the pinion flange. I threw it together but I wouldn't really know if it would work OK. Feel free to change anything you want. It should be very accurate if it works. You could probably make a steel strap that might work better. A small chain would make better contact. BE SAFE!! Skye killed the post on his web site, seems he might still be sore. It opens in MS Paint. Left click your cursor on it to enlarge the drawing.
You will need a piece of angle and right angle iron Dann BCC Edited 8 time(s). Last edit at 03/10/2012 06:45AM by kill r b. |
|
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (1554 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 79 MGB, Buick 215 |
Re: engine angle
A level carb can't possibly be that important. The only time it would be level 'round here is when it's parked in the garage. ;)
|
|
kill r b Dann Wade West Carrollton, Ohio (34 posts) Registered: 02/16/2012 07:57PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB ROADSTER 3500 V6 |
Re: engine angle
Hi Carl, could be very true. :-) I had an old round n' round stock car racer tell me once that they never used a carb on their stock cars in the '50's. It was just a foot operated valve and it dumped fuel in the manifold and whatever cylinder wanted it got it. He was just a good ole boy and I believed him from how he said it was installed. Must have been very reliable but a I hope they kept fire extiguishers aboard but I doubt it, them ole boys invented seat of your pants driving!. I didn't finish the whole description of the leveler so I went back and edited it. As I read it didn't make much sense. I also had it posted on the MG Experience too site but Skye said it was adverting and killed it and my membership again. Oh dear, I am such an annoying pest. ;-(
Dann BCC |
|
Re: engine angle
Our V8 and V6 mounts are adjustable to facilitate the setting of the engine. The ideal is a 3 degree which it will not affect the carb.
MGB has a 6-7 degree angle up on the axle, so 2-3 degree angle down on the engine is ok. Need room (angle) for passenger weight and extras. This will put the engine and axle at parallel lines or near. |
|
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (3524 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: engine angle
Plus any BOPR install that sits the engine low is going to end up right at 3 degrees anyway.
Jim |
|
triumphtr2 tim body St thomas ont Canada (87 posts) Registered: 08/18/2010 10:21PM Main British Car: 1954 TR2 serial # TS 110 L triumph 2 litre |
Re: engine angle
As we speak I am putting a Ford 2.3 Turbo Coupe motor into a TR3 and going through the pinion angle deal also.I was using my friends oil filled pinion angle finder and not having much luck since it wouldnt move just one or two degrees very easily.I thought maybe a digital level would give me a bettre readout. Un fortunately they cost around two hundred dollars.BUT I found a small square digital box at Lee Valley which is used to set table saw blades. It has magnets on three sides, reads to one tenth of a degree and works perfectly. Cost thirty eight dollars.If your going to be reading angles for anything you have to have one of these.They are the cats meow
|
|
|
|
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (2293 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: engine angle, driveshaft with cv's
Doesn't TR7 use cv's ? As I understand it, they don't have "phasing" issues like trunion style u-joints. Seems like cv's on a conventional drive shaft would be smoother, with less drag ? roverman.
|
|
ex-tyke Graham Creswick Chatham, Ontario, Canada (688 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 11:17AM Main British Car: 1976 MGB Ford 302 |
Re: engine angle
Sorry guys - I couldn't resist providing this film clip on performance carburetion (level flange or not!)
[videos2view.net] |
|
DiDueColpi Fred Key West coast - Canada (517 posts) Registered: 05/14/2010 03:06AM Main British Car: You can't turn a pig into a racehorse, so the question becomes, how fast can this pig go? |
Re: engine angle
Probably should use a "low flow" unit for the smaller engines.
|