MG Sports Cars

engine swaps and other performance upgrades, plus "factory" and Costello V8s

Go to Thread: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicLog In


BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
If we'd only known...
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: November 18, 2008 01:52PM

How many of us would have chosen differently?

If I'd only known a 350 Buick engine was only 100 lbs heavier than the stock 1800 would I have used the 350 instead of the 215?

If I'd only known that 2 piece Mustang hub/rotors would become obsolete would I have gone with GM?

If I'd only known how well a Jag IRS could fit an MGB would I have kept holding out for a ford 8" axle?

If I'd only known what a good choice a Buick 350 could be would I have ever begun playing with blowers?

If I'd only known the T5 was coming would I have ever installed a T-50?

If i'd held out for the T5 would I ever have considered an automatic?

These are all the kind of questions we ask ourselves from time to time. It would be interesting to get more perspectives on it. But what I personally would really like to know is how everyone feels about the first question. Back when you still had to make your own headers and motor mounts regardless of whether you picked the 215 or the 350 SBB's, if you had known you'd only pick up 100lbs with the 350 would you have done it?

I think I would have.

Jim


Moderator
Curtis Jacobson
Portland Oregon
(4577 posts)

Registered:
10/12/2007 02:16AM

Main British Car:
71 MGBGT, Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: Moderator
Date: November 18, 2008 02:30PM

There are LOTS of things I'd do differently... but generally I'd have used lighter parts, not heavier ones.


Bill Young
Bill Young
Kansas City, MO
(1337 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 09:23AM

Main British Car:
'73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: Bill Young
Date: November 18, 2008 04:49PM

..........that it would take me 3 1/2 years to get back on the road I might have left the 1275 in the car. If I'd only known what I would have missed by not meeting this bunch if I'd left it stock, I would have finished the V6 sooner.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/18/2008 04:50PM by Bill Young.


rficalora
Rob Ficalora
Willis, TX
(2764 posts)

Registered:
10/24/2007 02:46PM

Main British Car:
'76 MGB w/CB front, Sebring rear, early metal dash Ford 302

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: rficalora
Date: November 18, 2008 05:05PM

If I'd have ever known how long it'd take me to do all the body mods in addition to the engine swap, would I have broken this project into pieces? Probably... but would I have ever had the car I really wanted at the end of the day... probably not. [at least that's what I keep telling myself :)]


302GT
Larry Shimp

(241 posts)

Registered:
11/17/2007 01:13PM

Main British Car:
1968 MGB GT Ford 302 crate engine

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: 302GT
Date: November 18, 2008 06:05PM

I started with a 215 and went to a Ford 302. I would have considered a Buick 350, but it would be even more attractive if aluminum heads ever come out for it.

I agree that light is better in general, but the GT is more of a GT so I am happy with some weight in order to get lots of torque.

For light weight it makes more sense to use a modern, light twin cam 4 rather than the aluminum V8. A 2 liter or 2.5 liter aluminum block engine could be an excellent choice that could easily match the 215 power (but not torque). With a supercharger or a turbo it could hugely out perform a 215, in all respects, and still be lighter.


Dan B
Dan Blackwood
South Charleston, WV
(1007 posts)

Registered:
11/06/2007 01:55PM

Main British Car:
1966 TR4A, 1980 TR7 Multiport EFI MegaSquirt on the TR4A. Lexus V8 pl

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: Dan B
Date: November 19, 2008 10:50AM

And how much more does the big block weigh?


BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: November 19, 2008 02:31PM

Dan B Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And how much more does the big block weigh?

See there's a whole different philosophy at work here. On the one hand we (correctly) believe that less weight leads to better performance and on the other hand we believe (correctly also) that massive increases in torque are worth reasonable weight increases. It may be that the two viewpoints can never be reconciled because each can do things that the other cannot. Is a hot motocross bike capable of outrunning a top fuel dragster? Depends on the course of course. But for pure fun it's hard to beat a fire breathing, tire melting big displacement engine in a small lightweight car. High revs and nimble handling are great of course, but a smokey noisy beast is a sure crowd pleaser. Of course that's just my opinion.

Jim



BMC
Brian Mc Cullough
Forest Lake, Minnesota, USA
(383 posts)

Registered:
10/30/2007 02:27AM

Main British Car:
1980 MGB '95 3.4L 'L32' SFI V6, GM V6T5 & 3.42 Limi

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: BMC
Date: November 19, 2008 04:56PM

I would have built my 3.4L the same as I did but slowly modify it further which is exactly what i am doing. I guess what I am saying is that I am not unhappy with how things happened.

Now when it comes to my '59 Bugeye, I wish I had not pulled it apart in 1998 only to have four kids keeping us from rebuilding it.

-BMC.


Keith
Keith Tanner
Grand Junction, Colorado
(92 posts)

Registered:
10/31/2008 01:45AM

Main British Car:
For the purpose of this forum, 1972 MGB GT 5.7l Chevrolet LS1

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: Keith
Date: November 20, 2008 08:31PM

Okay, I'm paying close attention here to learn from everyone else's regrets :) Great discussion. I think I've got the weight and torque thing handled though.

I've spent a fair bit of time trying to get smaller engines to perform like big ones, and there really is a big difference in how they drive. Get a modern V8 in there and the four-cylinder simply won't see which way it went.


bplus
Tracy Moore
Jacksonville, Fl
(40 posts)

Registered:
11/24/2008 06:36PM

Main British Car:
71' MGB GT 350 Chevrolet

Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: bplus
Date: November 24, 2008 07:31PM

Ya'll wanna talk decisions, my brother and I are in the middle of three builds right now
with two more waiting. Currently building a V-8 '71 GT, a V-8 '76 roadster, and a '78
midget...ford engine and trans in that one. Lots of hummm let's see how this fits
going on. I've been watching the net with interest on the big block buick conversion
you're involved with Jim.


BMC
Brian Mc Cullough
Forest Lake, Minnesota, USA
(383 posts)

Registered:
10/30/2007 02:27AM

Main British Car:
1980 MGB '95 3.4L 'L32' SFI V6, GM V6T5 & 3.42 Limi

authors avatar
Re: If we'd only known...
Posted by: BMC
Date: November 24, 2008 10:13PM

Re-reading my post and the original theme of this thread, the items that you could say were not up to what I prefer now were a line of earlier MGBs that we changed over time. With every conversion, we find minor items to update or alter. Some of these take more time, some not.

-Some of our original harnesses were visually exposed yet no easier to work on.

-Some of our earlier cars had different minor equipment and hardware that has since then been updated for around the same price.

I am really pretty happy with the direction we have gone otherwise.

-BMC.


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.