Triumph Sports Cars

engine swaps and other performance upgrades, plus "factory" V8s (Stag and TR8)

Go to Thread: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicLog In
Goto Page: Previous1234567891011...LastNext
Current Page: 6 of 25


BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: June 08, 2008 10:35PM

Looks really good Calvin. I'm glad you found a solution for your filler neck. You can probably find a space saver that will work too, not all of them stick out on one side. The fuel neck manufacturers (one TRW company in particular) did a study on fuel flow in the filler tube. It turns out that the fuel flows in a spiral down the inner surface of the tube and the optimum size for this spiral is around 1-3/16" or 1-1/4" or thereabouts. Vapors are vented up the center of the spiral, meaning no separate vent is needed provided the bends don't get tight enough to collapse the spiral. The result of this study is that you'll find almost all cars built in the last decade use this same size filler tube. What this means for you is, should you find that the fuel puddles in your hose and causes trouble filling, you should be able to visit the junkyard and pick up some filler tube bends which you can substitute in and get good flow. At least it's an option to keep in your hip pocket if you need it. Interestingly enough, the spiral runs the opposite direction down under. Just a bit of trivia I thought you might enjoy.

Jim


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 09, 2008 01:19AM

Jim, "Very interesting trivia" inputing all that you said does make sense with the fuel fill.

I do have another filler neck that goes on the fuel cell, it has a very short 45*, if needed I could weld on another short 45* pipe so that the filler is about 3/4"above the cell and level to the cell. Doing this would take out the S in the filler tube.

The problem with the space saver is....think it won't make it in because of how high the back of the trunk is. There is 4 1/2" under the fuel cell. Think it won't make this angle in and under the cell.

I will take some 2x4 and make the 4 1/2" width/ 22" long and round the ends and check as a gauge for a space saver spare.


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 09, 2008 02:24AM

Don, "That must have been a blast" seeing those brit cars on that kind of road "Beeeutifull country roads"

Do you have any problems with any purists in your club running your V8??




DSCN0149.jpg This is a gettyup photo for me "Saaaweeet"

Did you go here on the Ohio Adventure and end up at Ravens Glenn winnery? "WOW" a Carona and fill up Yogi's (Yogi Bear the cartoon) picnic basket with a few cases...ah bottles of wine,reds and whites.....a great way to forget responsibilities. What a life indeed. Looks like a great place to eat and test the wine.

Here in Cali I'm sure you know, Napa is chuck full of winneries. About a hour and 40 min drive from my house.

That's it I'm done working....I'm hiring some people to do my job and office work ....work on my build 24/7 and go on some road trips....I'm ready for it, Brenda is too. OK back to reality.

restaurant_side_view.jpg

"Here"Gas prices now at the lowest costing gas stations is 4.45 a gallon. My thoughts on this #$%^&SUC.....


dining_room_300.jpg


Worked on the driver side foot well today installing the sheet metal. The foot well came out pretty well not loosing to much room for gas pedal.

Calvin


dwtr6v8
Don Watson
West Virginia
(305 posts)

Registered:
12/07/2007 07:45AM

Main British Car:
1974 TR6 Ford 5.0 HO

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: dwtr6v8
Date: June 10, 2008 07:58AM

Calvin,

Take your time, your doing a great job!

The local club is very accepting. The Western PA Triumph's Assoc. takes in all types and makes of cars.

[wptriumph.org]

We run a lot of events in conjunctions with the Healey and MG Club and we co sponsor the Pgh Vintage Grand Prix / British Car Day in Pittsburgh, PA.

Hosting about 600 to 700 British Cars, and that does not include the different makes,Domestic and Foreign! We take over an entire Golf Course with over 3000 cars. ( not allowed on the greens )
DSC01127.jpg
DSC01135.jpg
DSC01146.jpg

So if you or anyone on the forum are in the Pittsburgh, PA area around July 19,20, come on down and check it out!

Yes, the pic-nic basket is not just for show, but function. Corona for me, wine for Debi! That's how I get her into the runs and car shows!

I say that when you get your TR6/GM done you set up a run thru Napa Valley, just about the time I come visit!
DSCN0176.jpg


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 10, 2008 09:58AM

Nice Photo's Don. Huge turn out of Brit cars all lined up.

What kind of rollbar is that? It looks like it goes wider going into the car? It looks better than the norm.

Calvin


dwtr6v8
Don Watson
West Virginia
(305 posts)

Registered:
12/07/2007 07:45AM

Main British Car:
1974 TR6 Ford 5.0 HO

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: dwtr6v8
Date: June 10, 2008 10:18PM

It's a lot of work, by a lot of club volunteers, and all the proceeds go to charity.(some $89,000 since we started)

The roll bar is from Rimmer Brothers, in England.
[www.rimmerbros.co.uk:80]

It called an Alie Roll bar, dual bars, but only floor mount, not to the frame. Although with you skills you could make it to the frame.
p202b.jpg

Fitting is really tight and you must position the front bar mounting plate as far forward on the differential kick up in order for the soft top to still go up and down without conflict.

But I like the look, some what like the Triumph Stage and Benz 450SL!


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 11, 2008 10:32AM

I really like the looks of this roll bar, "Yes the 450SL Look".

It sure caught my eye on that photo of your's.

Is the top part of the bar have 2 pipes running along there?? Is that padding on the sides or sheet metal on the sides??

What is the overall height measurment? What size is the dia of the tubes? I know so may questions?????

Sharp looking!

I may try to make this rollbar.

Thanks Don,

Calvin



dwtr6v8
Don Watson
West Virginia
(305 posts)

Registered:
12/07/2007 07:45AM

Main British Car:
1974 TR6 Ford 5.0 HO

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: dwtr6v8
Date: June 11, 2008 09:47PM

Yes the roll bar is 2 pipes.

Padding

I'm not sure on the size of the bars, maybe 1 1/2, 1 3/4?
Slide1.jpg

Outside width is 33"
Height to top leading edge is 27 1/4"
Depth on the mounting plates is 11" ( leading edge of the front plate to the trailing edge of the back plate)

Unless you extend this to the frame, it's more for visual, some protection, maybe.

If you notice in the picture of my car, I had to make a custom boot cover as the stock unit will work with a single bar but not with a double bar unit.


cooks 7
Jon Cook
St. Louis, Mo
(28 posts)

Registered:
03/03/2008 02:05PM

Main British Car:
1969 Triumph Gt6 GM Ls1

Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: cooks 7
Date: June 12, 2008 11:48AM

I'd go with 1 3/4 diameter, at least that's what NHRA recomends for roll bars, 1 5/8 will suffice if you go full cage but roll bar only is supposed to be 1 3/4 in chromoly that is, not sure what regs are for mild steel, it is a nice looking design though


dwtr6v8
Don Watson
West Virginia
(305 posts)

Registered:
12/07/2007 07:45AM

Main British Car:
1974 TR6 Ford 5.0 HO

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: dwtr6v8
Date: June 12, 2008 10:55PM

For a different look, how about the following:
800-4.jpg
double_hoop_assembly.jpg
ROLLCAGEB1.jpg

These are different ideas from 6-Pack. I like the first style (BMW) with the slant forward stance.


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 26, 2008 09:55AM

Don,

Thanks for the other rollbar pic's, some good idea's.

Jon, Nice to know the size 1 3/4" is standard for rollbar for NHRA. Thanks.

It has been hard to weld on the body sheel metal. So I'm taking Bill Youngs great plans for the Rotisserie and making one. The materials total will cost around the 400 range. Much less than buying one.

[www.britishv8.org]

Will be using the worm gear for rotation "pretty cool Bill"

Will take some photo's and post soon.

I sure didn't like welding on my back.

Calvin


BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: June 26, 2008 12:07PM

Calvin, in my opinion the best feature you can add to a rotisserie is a device that lets you change the rotation center relative to the car body. This is because as you add and remove parts the center of gravity changes. The HF worm drive is very limited in how much variation it will handle. For instance, bolting in the IRS means it now takes 2 people to rotate the body, and the crossover point gets a little scary. Doors and such would have the same effect. You can use a stronger worm drive, or you can make the CG adjustable. I think that would be the better choice. Knowing your abilities, I'd expect you could come up with a good design.

Jim


Moderator
Curtis Jacobson
Portland Oregon
(4577 posts)

Registered:
10/12/2007 02:16AM

Main British Car:
71 MGBGT, Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: Moderator
Date: June 26, 2008 12:34PM

FWIW, I wouldn't even think about making a roll hoop in chrome-moly steel. IMHO, that's a material that's better left to professional, big-budget race teams. There are several reasons why mild steel is more appropriate, besides cost and easier availability. Among the reasons: you have to heat treat the welded areas of chrome-moly fabrications after creating them or you end up with a part with only similar strength as its mild steel equivalent, except with brittle welds. Brittle welds obviously aren't appropriate for roll hoops (or suspension parts.) When smart professional race teams do use chrome-moly, they farm out the heat treating to companies with elaborate equipment. Heat treating is not a job for do-it-yourselfers.

The usual reason for preferring chrome-moly on a race car is that it can be spec'd with thinner wall thickness to save weight.

Adding a pretty layer of chrome over a chrome-moly fabrication is a sin... because it invites a condition called "hydrogen embrittlement"... making a broken weld even more likely.

As for roll hoop tube diameters... that's just one criteria of selection. Obviously wall thickness is another, as is the construction of the tube itself (e.g. "seamless", "drawn-over-mandrel", etc.)

SCCA requirements are apparently quite different than NHRA...

I spec'd 1.75" seamless (DOM) mild steel tubing, w/ 0.090" wall thickness for the 6-point cage in my GT. A cage could have been constructed from 1.5" seamless tubing to meet SCCA requirements, and if I were a real racer I probably would have gone that way to save some weight. On the other hand, if I were a real racer there would have been a couple more (triangulating) tubes in my roll cage.


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: June 26, 2008 10:46PM

Jim,

I pictured you and Steve turning the roadmaster on your rotisserie and dealing with this weight issue :-) it must have been a little scary with weight offset. Very good point.

I won't be installing any heavy items on the body at all. All fenders, doors, hood, and trunk lid will not be going on the car body when on rotisserie. Only using rotisserie for installing very small amount of sheet metal. Will be cleaning the body tub and using for painting and prep work. So all in all it will stay fairly light in weight.

AS for CG some adjustment pins and telescope square tubing(2 different sizes) should work on attachment arms.

I'm using 4 1/2" OD and 4" OD sch 40 metal pipe for the rotating heads(one inside the other). At .250 thickness (each pipe) if the worm drive has a problem as a back up the 4"OD (inside pipe) pipe will have holes drilled every 1/2 " or so for adjustment position lock and the 4 1/2" OD pipe will have one hole going straight through the head with 1/2" dia 6" long pin.


Curtis,

Some good knowledge about chrome-moly, good info to know. If I was to build a roll bar, it would be out of DOM and probably 1.75.

I have a TR6 stock roll bar to start with and can modify later to the frame if needed.

Calvin


MGBV8
Carl Floyd
Kingsport, TN
(4512 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 11:32PM

Main British Car:
1979 MGB Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: MGBV8
Date: July 04, 2008 11:28AM

The SCCA also says that the main hoop is to be from one continuous piece, so no double hoop bars like above.



BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: July 04, 2008 05:09PM

I think you can get by with a double hoop if the driver's hoop is the main one, but I expect the bracing would have to convey that image.

Jim


MGBV8
Carl Floyd
Kingsport, TN
(4512 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 11:32PM

Main British Car:
1979 MGB Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: MGBV8
Date: July 04, 2008 05:31PM

I believe you are correct on that assumption, Jim.


Moderator
Curtis Jacobson
Portland Oregon
(4577 posts)

Registered:
10/12/2007 02:16AM

Main British Car:
71 MGBGT, Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: Moderator
Date: July 04, 2008 06:31PM

Jim wrote: "I think you can get by with a double hoop if the driver's hoop is the main one,"

I suspect SCCA's intent must have been to minimize the potential of failed welds or of buckling at tube intersections... As I understood the rules (and it's been a LONG time since I looked at them) the main tube that goes up and over the driver's head should be welded directly to mounting plates, not to other tubes. In other words, "continuous from mounting point to mounting point". Of course bracing tubes get welded TO the main hoop... but that shouldn't compromise its integrity. I think that in the last illustration (i.e. the one with the blue background) the hoop for the drivers side breaks the rules because it doesn't extend down to a mounting plate.


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: July 27, 2008 07:45PM

Finished the rotisserie, may need to weld in one more brace at a 45* angle on the upright. When mounting the body tub on the rotisserie, will have the 2000lbs worm drive on the front end of tub which is lighter. Did some adjustment for CG and width for mounting (used 1/2" pinch bolts with welded nuts). Found some wide wheel casters which will roll easy on cement. The mounting pads, used 3/8" bolt welded on plate, welded plate to the attachment arm. The rotating heads, used synthetic wheel bearing grease and packed well. Used 7/16" bolts and threaded into 1/2' thick metal rotating head. Mig welded everything with flux core .030 wire. Made sure there was alot of penetration on all welds.


pics 165.jpg


pics 166.jpg


pics 164.jpg


pics 167.jpg


74ls1tr6
Calvin Grannis
Elk Grove,CA
(1151 posts)

Registered:
11/10/2007 10:05AM

Main British Car:
74 TR6 / 71 MGB GT TR6/Ls1 71 MGB GT/Ls1

authors avatar
Re: Another New member saying Hi
Posted by: 74ls1tr6
Date: July 27, 2008 07:59PM

A few more pictures. Soon the body tub will go onto the rotisserie. Will be able to work on the tub and can work on the front frame skid plate frame area. The rotisserie took some time away from car progress but well worth making this roll around tool for holding the tub.

Moving ahead and looking forward to it.


Calvin

pics 168.jpg


pics 169.jpg


pics 162.jpg


pics 161.jpg
Goto Page: Previous1234567891011...LastNext
Current Page: 6 of 25


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.