Olds 215 Bugeye Progress
Hi there,
A quick introduction... My name is Greg and I'm a vintage racing restoration mechanic in Marin, CA. Back in the early '90s I built a couple of vintage Bugeyes up in Seattle, but haven't had my hands on one for many years. This week, I acquired a basket case that was last registered in '78, and the best part about it is the aluminum v8! :) I've spent some time cleaning the tub and investigating the motor, and it appears that I have an Olds F-85 motor with an upgrade to a 4 barrel. The number on the head starts with "S", so it should be the 155 hp model. I was able to get 6 spark plugs out, two are stuck, but the good news is that the motor does turn. I poked my borescope in the cylinders and only one looks really rusted. One of the piston crowns was clean enough to read the number stamped on top, 040. So it looks as though it's already been taken out to the max. Hopefully it doesn't have a wrecked liner. It is missing the gearbox, but there is an aluminum bellhousing and clutch in place, with a shortened driveshaft. There was an old iron bellhosing in the boot, which I suspect was from a Chevy, and right now I'm planning on finding a T-10. It has an unusual rear axle that I do not recognize. It has a bolt-on rear cover, 4 lug axle flanges, with a castle nut at the axle center. The drum brakes are large enough that the Sprite wheels don't fit, it has 14" steels on the back. You can check out lots of photos at my smugmug gallery: [getagripgreg.smugmug.com] If anyone knows this car from back in the day, I'd love to hear your story. I'd also appreciate any help ID'ing the axle and any ideas on the best gearbox to use. My initial plan is to get it up and running/driving, then tackle the body and chassis issues. Disc brakes #1 on the list! Thanks for contributing to this site, it's been very helpful to me already. Cheers, Greg Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/23/2015 11:44PM by getagripgreg. |
V6 Midget Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Welcome Greg. What an interesting car you've found. The rear axle looks like a MGB from the hub end. The axles don't appear to be redrilled and that was about the only 4 lug rear spicer type axle that I remember. I think that all the American Motors cars that used thay type axle were 5 lugs as well as the Jeep. The rear wheels appear to be reversed wheels from an early Mustang, Comet, or Maverick with the 6 cylinder engines. All those were the same 4 lug pattern as the MGB.
Are you planning on restoring the car as it was originally built or upgrading? If you are going to upgrade I'd go ahead and fit a T5 instead of the T10, it's not much different in size and the overdrive is really nice. The car really reminds me of my first Bugeye I owned for a few months back in 69 when I was in the Navy in San Diego. That one had a Chevy 283 stuffed in. If you can move the engine back just a bit you'd probably be able to get the hood shape back to normal with a different radiator. Might need a small bump for the distributor and a small scoop over the carb, but a lot nearer the original look. FYI, the 10 bolt Chevy rear used in the later Vegas and Chevy Monzas had the same 4" 4 lug pattern as the Sprite and a lot of ratios available and works with 13" wheels. An alternative if you want to get back to 13" wheels and tires and match the Spridget front disc brake pattern as well. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/27/2008 03:36PM by V6 Midget. |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Hi Bill,
Thanks for your input! I found out today that the axle is almost certainly from a Triumph TR4, or similar Triumph. That 10 bolt Chevy tip is worth remembering. I like the idea of keeping to 13" wheels, and I suspect the 2 liter Triumph axle won't last long with Olds power. :) I do plan on keeping the V-8, and it is already as far back as it can go (fully behind the front spindles). My choice between a T-10 and T-5 will come down to where the shifter lives. I might try an S-10 Chevy T-5, as I understand the lever is much farther forward vs the Camaro model. But I think the car was modified for a T-10 (prior to 1978), so keeping the driveshaft and mounts will make it easier. I haven't decided what to do about the bonnet. The distributor requires a hump well forward. I think I'll repair the cutout above the grille on this one for now. I certainly don't want to molest an otherwise clean bonnet. I might try to find a glass hood to cut up. Thanks again and cheers, Greg |
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6507 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
If you go with a crank trigger ignition you can get rid of the distributor bulge. I personally like the Ford EDIS system. It's very simple to adapt to the Olds 215. You do need a timing controller for it though. I'd suggest looking into the MegaSquirt and related products. For spark only there's the MegaJolt which should handle the task.
Jim |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
That must have been a popular conversion. 10 years ago I answered a newspaper ad for a 215 that had to be removed from the car. It was in a totally rusted out Bugeye.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2008 09:22AM by Dave. |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Update:
I freed up the frozen carb last week and decided to try running the motor this last weekend. I had to disass the starter to repair the solenoid, and after I got the last two plugs out, it spun over easily. :D However, the #1 hole wasn't pushing out any air. A look down the hole showed bad news, a broken valve. :( I pulled the head and apparently, the valve head had simply rusted off while sitting, somewhere in the last 30 years. There was no sign of damage to the piston or chamber! I pulled the other head and removed all the valves to check for other damage and found none. But, I found that someone had replaced one head somewhere along the line, and they used the wrong type. I have one 10.5:1 ratio head and one 8.5:1... The valves are about .080 longer on one side. So it's a bummer. I went from preparing to buy new valves and putting it back together, to needing to find a casting to match either side. I can't simply mill one head because it will screw up the intake alignment. Damn. On the plus side, I borrowed a gearbox for a test fitting that happened to be living in the same storage spot. It was a Muncie M20 from a Corvette, and it slid right up. I have yet to figure out which box used a 16 spline output to suit the driveshaft I have. Jim, thanks for the tip on the crank trigger. Right now, the plan is to piece this together for the bare minimum of cash. I can start toying and tricking it out after it's a driver. More pics uploaded:[getagripgreg.smugmug.com] Cheers, Greg |
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Greg, you're getting a pretty good start on the car. I took a look at the photos and finally saw the interior area around the trans tunnel. That's an area you need to get repaired and reinforced as the Sprite chassis gets a lot of its strength from that area. It makes servicing the trans a lot tougher, but you'll be amazed how much more ridged the chassis will be if the tunnel is complete and welded in place and the center crossmember completed from side to side. I was able to just add another 2" square tubing section directly behind my original crossmember and use that for the transmission mount, or you may want to drop it under, but that makes tilting the engine trans assembly a bit harder unless you make it a bolt in. Either way the upper area will be much stronger if it's a completely welded sheet metal assembly. If you make it a bolt in then try to use a lot of small fasteners spaced about 1" apart all around the cover. Photo of my car's transmission tunnel and crossmember area attached. I added a small access panel above the U-joint area to aid in installing the driveshaft.
As far as the transmission yoke, sounds like a standard Chevy spline for the T10 box, I'll have to check my old yolks and count the splines in them. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/06/2008 09:02AM by Bill Young. |
|
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Looks like a good idea for the reinforcement Greg. The small tubing will give you a great framework to mount the sheet metal from and add a bit of stiffness as well. On the subject of brakes, I found this setup on a raceing Spridget and it looks like it wouldn't be hard to duplicate. The master cylinders and balance bar can be purchased for around $300, then you do the welding to the original pedal mount and pedals. I think this is the solution to my problems relating to the Chevy rear brakes which have a slightly larger fluid volume in the cylinders and cause my pedal travel to be longer than I'd like. I'll just use a slightly larger bore master cylinder for the rear to compensate and do the fine balance adjustment with the bar. If you don't want to try the fabrication then the assembly is available for $750 ready to bolt in from the race shop.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/07/2008 08:13AM by Bill Young. |
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Great news about the front brakes, a good score for sure. In your case the master cylinder unit shown doesn't make as much sense as it does for a later Spridget owner. Later cars used a seperate master cylinder for the brakes and clutch and they both have an unusual mounting bolt arrangement that is tilted about 30 degrees off straight up and down, makes using the cylinders with the integral resevouirs a problem, so the remote units are used and the cylinders tilted to match the bolt pattern. For the Bugeye owner with the dual master cylinder it probably makes more sense to just fabricate a pedal assembly from scratch or just use the complete Tilton assembly. The assembly shown was using the stock pedal box assembly modified to add the third cylinder and still bolt into the stock mounting points. I thought it might be easier to use the later assemlby in your car than fabricate a completely new pedal box for three cylinders.
|
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
My understanding is that the stock pedalbox was typically retained because of a rule for SCCA Production classes requiring the standard pedal and cylinder mounts. My buddy that sold me the car is friendly with the guys at Huffaker (and our shop is in the same building), and he's trying to get access to some of the patterns they used. I'm still eyeballing various cylinders and parts...
If we want to keep with the period rules to keep in the spirit of things, and the rules permitted tubular spacers, I would think a fabricated spacer that rotated the mounting holes to vertical would be ok... Regardless, my car isn't likely to ever be accepted my CSRG, though I would LOVE to race in C-Mod against Scarabs and Cheetahs. :) So I'll probably just fabricate my own box to suit my sense of aesthetics. Other news... I got a gearbox tonight! Craigslist to the rescue again. It's a "rebuilt" Muncie M20 that appears to be new inside. I'll find out more tomorrow. Now I only need a shifter mechanism and the correct yoke for my driveshaft. Yay! (And coming up fast on 4X the purchase price of the car) Booo. Cheers, Greg |
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
You're making great progress Greg. I understand about the pedal assembly now, your plan makes more sense if you have to keep the stock pedal box. Hurst still makes shifters for the Muncie, but I've also had good results using stock Chevy shifters after a bit of massaging to eliminate the slop from them. Amazing what a little TLC and welding can do to tighten up the factory tolerances. I prefered using the stock shifters because of the reverse lockout feature. I like your idea of the tubular spacers that rotate the mounting bolts. That would enable me to use a variety of master cylinder types, not just limited to Tilton or Girling. Heck I could use three stock MGB clutch masters and probably save myself a few bucks as I already have a couple of those. All I'd need is a check valve inline for the rear brakes. Good idea and thanks.
|
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Update,
I've got my heads back together and ready to go on. I got an el-cheapo shifter from Ebay, very badly made Chinese part, but it was a universal kit for $70 so I didn't expect much. Its a starting point. Like you suggested, I'm going to take it apart to tighten up the slop and stiffen up the reverse detent spring. I also scored another bugeye bonnet that's unmolested, but a little rusty. I'm going to bolt up the Muncie today to measure for the propshaft and check the gear lever position. I've also got a late pedal box with masters, and a pair of disc brake hubs. Now I only need rotors and calipers (and hoses, and pipes, and rear cylinders, etc etc...) On the MC setup, I found that Wilwood sells a copy of the Girling integral resevoir for under $50 each. Going away for all of next week, so unfortunately I can't do much work. Cheers till then, Greg |
|
BMC Brian Mc Cullough Forest Lake, Minnesota, USA (384 posts) Registered: 10/30/2007 02:27AM Main British Car: 1980 MGB '95 3.4L 'L32' SFI V6, GM V6T5 & 3.42 Limi |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Sounds like Fun. A *bit* faster than my 1275 Bugeye!
-BMC. |
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6507 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: New member with Olds 215 Bugeye
Hey, congrats! (You're having too much fun,... now just try to settle down a little bit....) Seriously though, this is what it's all about, don't you think?
Jim |