Shamrock Scott Drewa Wisconsin (7 posts) Registered: 06/23/2021 11:27PM Main British Car: 1955 Austin Healey 100-4 V6 Turbo |
Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
I have the new frame and rear suspension installed now in trying to figure out if I should rebuild and use the factory rearend or go with a traditional 8.8 or 9 inch. Im interested in knowing if the factory rearend can handle the horse power increase of a small block?
|
kstevusa kelly stevenson Southern Middle Tennessee (985 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 09:37AM Main British Car: 2003 Jaguar XK8 Coupe 4.2L DOHC/ VVT / 6sp. AT |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
Maybe mention the specific engine you have in mind. Small Block is a wide variety of engines? We could get a better idea of the durability you need. Personally, I have no idea on the Healey strength. Someone else wil chime in later with more info.
|
Shamrock Scott Drewa Wisconsin (7 posts) Registered: 06/23/2021 11:27PM Main British Car: 1955 Austin Healey 100-4 V6 Turbo |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
Ok..your right . I haven't figured out what type of small block yet, I have a V6 with a turbo sitting in my garage but I also have axis to a ford 289 hipo motor . I figure they both make just under 300 HP , so maybe I should just talk horse power figures.
|
88v8 Ivor Duarte Gloucestershire UK (1049 posts) Registered: 02/11/2010 04:29AM Main British Car: 1974 Land Rover Lightweight V8 |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
The 100-6 produced 140lb-ft.
The 3000 made about 170lb-ft. The hipo would make around 300lb-ft. The factory axle might survive behind an auto box if the wheels aren't too wide, the tyres aren't too sticky and the driver isn't lead footed, but unless you're making a resto rod I'd be inclined to sell the factory axle and go with a 9 inch. Ivor |
DiDueColpi Fred Key West coast - Canada (1375 posts) Registered: 05/14/2010 03:06AM Main British Car: I really thought that I'd be an action figure by now! |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
Unless your Healey has a pickup box on it, a 9inch might not be your best choice.
It would definitely be unbreakable, but there are lots of live axles out there that will handle the power with out doubling unsprung weight. Having to tame an excessively obese rear end in a light car is a bitch. For me, something in the 8 inch range would more than accommodate the power and tire that you can fit into that Healey. Live like you mean it. Fred |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
8" Ford can swallow 31 spline axles, with matching carrier. Aluminum center section available.
|
|
HealeyRick Rick Neville (491 posts) Registered: 12/19/2007 05:01PM Main British Car: 1963 Austin-Healey 3000 Ford 5.0L |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
I think a lot will have to do with how you intend to use the car and what kind of wheels and tires you are going to run. I have a 345 hp SBF with a stock rear end. I also have 72-spoke wire wheels with 185-15 tires and seldomly do smoky burnouts. The tires are going to light up before the axles break. If you use wide sticky tires and do clutch dumps or drag racing starts you're going to break stuff. Otherwise, you'll be fine with the stock set up That rear end is pretty tough Racing Healeys in Europe regularly run stock rear ends and 300 hp.
|
Shamrock Scott Drewa Wisconsin (7 posts) Registered: 06/23/2021 11:27PM Main British Car: 1955 Austin Healey 100-4 V6 Turbo |
Re: Austin-Healey 100-6 rearend strength
This is why I come here for the info I need, it's great to have people around that have eather done it or know so much about these cars.. I'm getting the impression I'm being to vague about the motor I'm putting in but I have so many options I'm not sure yet.. Thanks HealeyRick.. I really like your post , you basically answered questions I haven't asked yet. I want to run wire wheels still and I feel I need to run a rearend with a carrier that opens from the front.
|