David David T Lomita CA (6 posts) Registered: 09/13/2009 03:04PM Main British Car: buick 215 w/ T5 3.70 vette rear |
rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Hello all, I took a look on this site and found willpower and wildcat intake manifolds, but wasnt able to find where to get them. Does anybody have a webpage or phone #. Or know where to look for a used single plane carby manifold for the early rover V8. I was told by a friend of mine that torque power might make those????? I looked on their site and found nothing. Waiting for e-mail back from them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, David 67wickens@sbcglobal.net 213 792-6270
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/13/2009 04:10PM by David. |
castlesid Kevin Jackson Sidcup UK (361 posts) Registered: 11/18/2007 10:38AM Main British Car: 1975 MGB GT Rover V8 4.35L |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
David,
The manifold you mention was originally made by Huffaker and was effectively copied by Harcourt in Australia and as far as I know they are only available from Wildcat and JE Developments in the UK. but you could try Faxing Harcourt to see if they still actually make them. Be interested to hear of another source as they are not cheap at £360.00 but obviously cast in small numbers. Link showing the Harcourt and Wildcat versions. [www.btinternet.com] kevin. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/13/2009 06:05PM by castlesid. |
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
They aint cheap!!!!
Maxwedge performance 10 Jaffa Rd Dural, New South Wales 2158 Australia Phone : 011 61 2 96513550 ask for Bill Laney... Remember they are 17 hours ahead of you.. so if you call from LA at 7pm it will be noon the next day where he is at..... you will need to do an International wire transfer from your bank into his.... |
castlesid Kevin Jackson Sidcup UK (361 posts) Registered: 11/18/2007 10:38AM Main British Car: 1975 MGB GT Rover V8 4.35L |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Tony,
Maxwedge are apparently the manufacturer of the Willpower intake and a web search came up with a price of $650.00 AUS so not much difference in price although oyu exchange rate might be more helpful. Of the three manifolds, Wildcat, Harcourt or Willpower I don't think there is a lot of difference as they are all based on the original Huffaker as far as I can find out. Kevin. |
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Keep an eye out in Australia. I got mine from Triumph Rover Spares in Adelaide:
[www.triumphroverspares.com.au] They just so happened to have one laying around. I got it for $150 but it took $100 to get it to the USA. In hindsight though it was worth it. I stayed up late at night to call them after emailing a couple times. I just saw a pic of it in their part specials section. They could come across them now and again though. Mine had been modified for a spread bore carb. It's a Hardcourt BTW. Good luck man! Also peep the AU ebay... |
Dan Jones Dan Jones St. Louis, Missouri (308 posts) Registered: 07/21/2008 03:32PM Main British Car: 1980 Triumph TR8 3.5L Rover V8 |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
> Of the three manifolds, Wildcat, Harcourt or Willpower I don't think
> there is a lot of difference as they are all based on the original > Huffaker as far as I can find out. I don't believe that is the case. I have both a Willpower and a Huffaker here. They are different intakes and performed differently in my flow bench testing. The Huffaker has Buick 300 sized ports and requires an external thermostat. The Willpower has ports slightly larger than a Rover/Buick 215 and has an integral thermostat. The Willpower can also be ordered with injector bungs. The Willpower is apparently the same as the Wildcat intake, though. Here's a previous post I made after testing the Huffaker and Willpower intakes: After the heads were ported, I spent a little time evaluating a couple of Rover V8 single plane intake manifolds on Dave McLain's flow bench in Cuba, Missouri. I wanted to know which of the intakes would flow best when bolted to the ported 1964 Buick 300 aluminum heads. The two intakes tested were a Huffaker: [www.bacomatic.org] [www.bacomatic.org] [www.bacomatic.org] and a Willpower: [www.bacomatic.org] [www.bacomatic.org] Note the Willpower intake pictured is not the actual intake tested. I've not yet taken pitures of the intake we tested but it differs from the one pictured in that it has EFI injectors bungs in each port but the injectors were not installed for these tests. The Huffaker has larger ports which better match the Buick 300 heads: [www.bacomatic.org] The Willpower has smaller Rover-sized ports but has a better radius on the end runners than the Huffaker. An end port and a center port of the head were first flowed without an intake attached to get a baseline, then flowed with the intake bolted in place. Also, a Holley 780 carb body with the throttle plates at full open was bolted to the intake to represent the pressure drop across a carb or fuel injection throttle body. I'll be using an EFI throttle body later but have not purchased it yet. When the heads were ported, they were tested on a Superflow bench at a 28" H2O pressure drop. The head had a clayed intake radius but no exhaust pipe stub was used on the exhaust. Those numbers are shown in the 2nd and 3rd columns. The 4th and 5th columns are the same head flowed on Dave's bench which has a 10" H2O pressure drop. The numbers were converted mathematically to 28" to be on a consistent basis. Note the numbers are somewhat lower than those of the 28" bench. We're not sure if this due in part to the conversion or is simply bench-to-bench variation. In any case, it doesn't influence the results of the intake manifold tests. On both single plane intakes, the center runners are short and straight while the end runners are long and curved, so one center port and one end port were tested. The Huffaker was bolted to the head and tested first, followed by the Willpower. The results are shown below and are best viewed in a non-proportional font like courier: Valve Buick 300 Ported Buick 300 Same head with Same head with Lift 1964 head on McLain's Huffaker intake Willpower intake (inch) aluminum flow bench center runner center runner ported 10" numbers Int Exh converted to 28" CFM % of CFM % of 1.775" 1.5" Int Exh bare bare 1.775" 1.5" head head Int Exh center port 0.050 -- -- 26.3 22.6 26.1 99.2 27.6 104.9 0.100 66 47 56.3 51.6 55.1 97.9 56.4 100.2 0.150 99 82 86.8 75.0 87.8 101.1 89.0 102.5 0.200 129 104 115.1 98.4 117.2 101.8 119.1 103.5 0.250 155 119 140.4 114.1 141.4 100.7 142.8 101.7 0.300 174 130 158.1 125.4 160.6 101.5 160.0 101.2 0.350 187 139 171.7 134.4 169.9 98.9 167.9 98.0 0.400 191 146 179.8 140.2 170.5 94.8 172.2 95.8 0.450 194 150 181.3 143.2 172.6 95.2 174.3 96.1 0.500 196 152 182.1 144.3 173.9 95.5 175.3 96.2 Valve Buick 300 Ported Buick 300 Same head with Same head with Lift 1964 head on McLain's Huffaker intake Willpower intake (inch) aluminum flow bench end runner end runner ported 10" numbers Int Exh converted to 28" CFM % of CFM % of 1.775" 1.5" 1.775" 1.5" bare bare end head head port 0.050 -- -- 25.5 22.6 26.8 105.9 26.9 105.5 0.100 66 47 55.0 51.6 56.6 102.9 55.4 100.7 0.150 99 82 87.0 75.0 88.2 101.4 88.6 101.8 0.200 129 104 116.9 98.4 114.1 97.6 119.8 102.5 0.250 155 119 143.4 114.1 132.5 92.4 144.6 100.8 0.300 174 130 157.8 125.4 146.5 92.8 164.8 104.4 0.350 187 139 171.6 134.4 155.6 90.7 173.3 101.0 0.400 191 146 178.3 140.2 156.9 88.0 175.0 98.1 0.450 194 150 180.8 143.2 156.6 86.6 176.0 97.3 0.500 196 152 182.9 144.3 157.6 86.2 175.3 95.8 Despite the smaller runners, the Willpower is the better flowing manifold. The center ports on both intakes are quite close to the head flow but the Huffaker end ports are not as good. I think it would be worthwhile to port just the ends of the Huffaker intake end runners with a better radius to see if the flow loss could be recovered. There's a slight drop off in flow as lift increases on the Willpower intake that may be due to the small port size. The Willpower could be ported to a larger size but given how close the intake is to the bare head flow, it's probably not worth the trouble. The worst flows are at 96%. As a point of comparison, we've recently flow tested a couple of (non-Rover) dual plane intake manifolds and they were in the mid seventy % flow range (unported). The exhaust-to-intake flow ratio on these heads is excellent. Dave thought a bit larger itake valve, at the expense of exhaust valve size, might make more power if it were practical. During our tests, a 4" diameter tube was used to simulate the effects of the cylinder wall. To see if shrouding might be a problem, the tube was moved around (closer to the valve) but little effect was noted. Dan Jones |
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Maxwedge is the manufacturer of the Willpower intake as well as the Wildcat version for the stock rover heads...
The Harcourt and Huffaker are both different manifolds as well and neither are being manufactured anymore. |
|
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4598 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
(for Dan Jones and others)
Want to insert a table into your message? I set up this message board to allow some HTML tricks. Here's a big hint what the proper syntax for a table would look like... With a little cutting, pasting, and some very minor editing, this: Quote: ...will create a table that look like this:
Other HTML commands can be used to change alignment of data within the table cells, etc. |
David David T Lomita CA (6 posts) Registered: 09/13/2009 03:04PM Main British Car: buick 215 w/ T5 3.70 vette rear |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
does anybody know max-wedge performance e-mail address??? Also curious,, These manifolds(Willpower etc) do fit the 215 and the 300 or is there a difference??? Thanks, David
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/15/2009 09:12PM by David. |
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
The willpower manifolds do fit the 215.. and a 215 block with 1964 Buick 30 heads..
it will not fit a Buick 300 without adapter plates... They are too wide. You can try to contact Bill ...williaml@hotkey.net.au |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Wow, Almost exciting, got my "Wildcat" 4bbl. manifold today."No charge" for machining debree" left in manifold. I figure because they were soo rushed to fill my order...over 4 months. All 24, "top hat liners" also arrived. Problem there is,all must be bored aleast 3.75" to clean-up. Best I can hope for is a, "very warm place will freeze over", before I re-order. Anyone want a new , manifold they don't have to wait 4+ months for? I'm beginning to see why we declared independence so long ago.LOL.-almost. roverman.
|
castlesid Kevin Jackson Sidcup UK (361 posts) Registered: 11/18/2007 10:38AM Main British Car: 1975 MGB GT Rover V8 4.35L |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Art,
Was the manifold direct from Wildcat, does not sound like the sort of service you would expect from Ian Richardson? kevin. |
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Art, You got 24 liners? I like the 3.75" bore though, even if you have to do it. It makes a true 300 then!… Ok I've got issues.
|
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Got my Willpower intake from maxwedge performance in Australia in just a couple weeks... Good casting. no machine shavings..
![]() Water neck not included.. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/06/2009 01:01PM by hoffbug. |
|
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Kevin, Yes Ian. Not the type of service I was expecting. Nic, you've got issues? I've got 24 "oversize" liners and I'm not even a super-senior! Pic for manifold-not easy-I'm ninethumbs. Looks just like manifolds posted in forum, except for 'debris and age-spots". Has thermostat cross-over but no injector bungs. I will install sleeves with, "Loctite Sleeve Retainer"-anerobic. Most of my blocks are "pink", so , bore-out old sleeves and definately visual and sonic test. Block filler on"killer"motor. Happy HP. roverman.
|
v8fangio Steve Foldhazy Sydney,OZ (5 posts) Registered: 10/04/2009 12:17AM Main British Car: 73 MGBGTV8 M.G.4.2 |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Bill Laney [Max Wedge] in Sydney OZ makes Willpower manifolds which is same manifold sold in U.K. by Ian Ricardson under his company name of Wildcat. Bill Laney also makes a V- shaped cast adaptor similar to factory BGTV8 but better flowing, to take 2 S.U carbs; manifold can come with cast lugs on inlets to be drilled out for injectors;and adaptor plate is available for putting on a blower. There is also wider version of Willpower manifold to go on Aussie Leyland P76 4.4. v8 , saves adding spacer plates to Rover or Hardcourt manifolds, not sure if this will fit Buick 300.[ i have a Huffaker on my BGTV8 and Willpower on my Leyland P76 4.4 v8.]
|
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: rover 3.5 single plane intake??
Steve.. I had forgotten about the P76 intake!... I wonder if it would be a direct swap onto a Buick 300?
I found these pictures on the web. from a site in the Netherlands....[www.roversd1.nl] ![]() left to right: Buick 215, 64 Buick 300, 73 Leyland P76, 67 Buick 340 ![]() left to right: 3 Intakes, P76, Buick 300, Buick 215 Hard to tell but from the pictures the P76 manifold it looks just a little wider than the Buick 300 manifold? Anyone know for sure? |