NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Offy covers tall enough?
Ok so I'm back pedaling on the fabrication of the valve covers... Do you guys think the offy covers are tall enough for my 544 lift?
|
hoffbug Tony Hoffer Minnesota (323 posts) Registered: 10/15/2007 05:25PM Main British Car: Olds 215 EFI |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
I bet woody at the wedgeshop would know... I know on the SBC stuff the height really only makes a big diff when running a stud girdle..Where you run into a issue is the rockers rubbing on the inside of the cover... That is why when you see fabricated covers for a SBC that are kicked out on the sides.. specially clearenced on the pushrod side.. .
![]() Note how the bolt holes have a tunnel running down to them because the sides are kicked out for added clearance... Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/21/2009 01:54PM by hoffbug. |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Nic, Tried 340 oem.'s? I sold them to Real Steel to clear rockers better. Kinda look cool too.roverman.
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
|
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6508 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Aren't the Rover covers taller?
Jim |
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Not sure. They're definitely taller on the side I don't need them to be. I sorta wish they were beveled the other way instead of upright for a level surface.
|
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Nic-et. all, My "Huff" motor uses cast, late Rovers, with-out spacers. Using roller cam, lotsa spring and lift. They had to "notch" underside at filler port, to clear Volvo rockers. Second look? roverman.
|
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Thanks man. That's what I was looking for. Actually one more thing. Can you measure your Rover cover on the intake side and tell me how high it is? I need about 3" at least I think. I'll double check.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/25/2009 06:48PM by NixVegaGT. |
spridget bill green Maine (74 posts) Registered: 03/22/2008 01:29PM Main British Car: 3 1980 TR8, 1 TR7 2 Bugeye Sprite 1 MG midget TR8 3.5 and 5.0, Sprite 1098 and ? |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Hi, I am building a 4.0 with Buick 300 crank and heads. I am using Harland Sharp roller rockers and the stock Rover/TR8 rocker covers will not fit. Bill
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
OK that settles that. Thanks Bill. I've got the same setup so on to another solution. I think I may make spacers and get some SBC fabbed covers then.
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
OK so I've had some feedback from guys who got the fabbed covers and they weren't great. Then I thought I'd search for cast ones. I found some nice cast SBC covers for just another $40. Comp Cams makes some nice cast covers for $119 from Summit.
Then I thought, since I'm fabricating some adapters anyway, why not peep how much TA sells their Buick rockers. $139, not bad! I was looking for something natural cast anyway so they fit the bill just fine and they look really cool. ![]() Here's my question. How close is the valve cover flange size of the 350 vs. the 215/340? I've only seen adapter plates for Ford or Chevy but that is probably because of all the offerings. I figured I'd fab my own adapter plates anyway so why not go for some covers that are way different than the typical Chevy or Ford. What do you guys think? |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
For about ,$3,800. more you can have some pretty good heads and rockers, that will almost fit? When I learn to post pictures,(nine thumbs), I have, Really Tall , "Buicks" in 1 pc. and 2 pc., cast alum.,(removable lid for hot-lash adjustments). I wish our forum had a "store" for sales of rare and needed parts like the "Jensen Healey Presevation Society" does. Might be a good, reliable source of income for the forum. Maybe an online or printed book of "How To" and How it was Done" resource? As a manufacturer, I would cut a good deal. Thoughts anyone? roverman.
|
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6508 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
The TA covers are as good as they come from what I've heard but that doesn't mean perfect by any means. Look carefully at the extra machining operations as they affect cost. They will certainly set off the engine nicely.
I had Gary bring over a SBC head and we set Buick valve covers on it. I don't think you're going to like it though. The SBC hangs out 5/16" on each end so it wouldn't look right. The top bolts are off about 1/4" each and the bottom ones are off about 1/2" each. The corners on the SBC are squared off a lot more. I just don't think it'd look good myself, better to just make up a set of risers if you need the extra space. Jim |
castlesid Kevin Jackson Sidcup UK (361 posts) Registered: 11/18/2007 10:38AM Main British Car: 1975 MGB GT Rover V8 4.35L |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Nick,
A better solution for probably the same work would be to buy a second set of the flat top rover covers and then cut the flanges of one set and cut the second set to give the height you need and weld them. Allow enough height so that the baffles can be retained or you will get excess oil blown out but watch out for the height interfering with your intended induction system. Kevin. |
castlesid Kevin Jackson Sidcup UK (361 posts) Registered: 11/18/2007 10:38AM Main British Car: 1975 MGB GT Rover V8 4.35L |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Nick,
A better solution for probably the same work would be to buy a second set of the flat top rover covers and then cut the flanges of one set and cut the second set to give the height you need and weld them. Allow enough height so that the baffles can be retained or you will get excess oil blown out but watch out for the height interfering with your intended induction system. Also make sure you have enough room internally for the end rocker shaft supports. Kevin. |
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
I measured the flanges on my Buick 340 covers they measured just under 5" wide and almost 18.75" long at the outside edge of the flange.
I found some dimensions that correlate with yours, Jim. 5.12" wide and 19.625 long. Here's a pic of those: It looks like I could chop off the ends of the flange part and be fine but then I probably don't have a flange anymore. LOL! Thanks so much for going to the trouble of checking a chevy head for me. That's great info and good input for my decision. I should have said in my post "350 vs. 215/340" that I was asking if the Buick 350 flange was much different. Anybody know what the Buick 350 flange dimensions are? It is also true that I could just make spacers for the Offy or Rover covers... For the 340 covers for that matter, which may not be a bad idea. I just figured if I was going to the trouble maybe I should make adapters instead and use those cool TA covers. |
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6508 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
I think the only difference in the 350 SBB covers is in the bolt hole locations. Mike Jr at TA says they are looking at drilling the flanges of their new heads to accept either the Rover or the 350 covers so it sounds like they are the same anyway. Heck, for what they're planning on charging they ought to include the 350 valve covers.
Guess you could build up a little weld and drill your heads for the 350 pattern... Jim Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2009 11:58AM by BlownMGB-V8. |
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
I was thinking the same thing about welding bosses on for the 350 bolt pattern. It might be easier than fabricating a bolt on adapter plate. The heads are super clean right now so it'd be good timing.
|
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
|
NixVegaGT Nicolas Wiederhold Minneapolis, MN (659 posts) Registered: 10/16/2007 05:30AM Main British Car: '73 Vega GT 4.9L Rover/Buick Stroker |
Re: Offy covers tall enough?
Crap. I just realized I didn't post any pix of the TA covers on the Rover yet. I still need to fabricate some adapter plates but here's what it'll look like. COOL!
The angle is sorta weird and pretty tight because of it but there's definitely room for the rockers and 544 lift. I suppose I could put an angled adapter plate on there... What do you guys think? |