en ian jenkins Mississauga Ont canada (67 posts) Registered: 12/27/2010 11:06AM Main British Car: 77 tr7 |
camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
I have a 5 speed tr7 with a 1989 rover 3.5L with 14CUX and tube headers. Engine is stock. Car is just a road driven fun vehicle
My camshaft is worn and needs to be replaced is there a cam available that is an improvement over stock? I may do a full performance upgrade one day, but just want it on the road to enjoy this summer Thanks in advance ian PS, i searched the archives but most threads were for modified engines. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/04/2013 07:09PM by en. |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
IMHO, many of the major aftermarket cam mfg's,Isky, Crane and Crower/etc., make FT. hydraulic cams for BOR. Keep it fairly mild and verify idle vacum is adequate,(standard computer tune), valve to piston clearance and valve seal to retainer clearance is good.Side note, 215 Olds used "Beehive" springs with lightweight retainers,(upgrade). Don't get "excessive" on Zinc oil additive, (there is a tipping point). Good Luck, roverman.
|
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4577 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
Kenne Bell no longer sells camshafts, so I expect you're unlikely to find the exact grind I used when I built my Buick 215. Its published specs were 0.462" lift (both intake and exhaust), 260 degree duration, and 110 degree lobe center. Would I recommend it? I've always liked the noise it makes... but the grind seems to work better now that I've swapped cylinder heads to achieve an increase in compression ratio (i.e. from ~8.8:1 up to ~10:1). I don't know all that much about cams, but my impression is that a milder cam might have suited the lower-compression better.
What's your compression ratio? |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
You want a cam that will build best "dynamic" compression, in your needed rpm range.This means faster lift rates, with just enough overlap. One reason oem's went to hydraulic roller cams, is because of this, = more efficient. Cheers, roverman.
|
|
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
You might consider talking to a "cam tech", at which cam company, your interested in. TA Performance or Crower may have a suitable cam, in stock. Crower has # 50230, as their mildest cam. Good Luck, roverman.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/07/2013 06:34PM by roverman. |
en ian jenkins Mississauga Ont canada (67 posts) Registered: 12/27/2010 11:06AM Main British Car: 77 tr7 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
Great, thanks Art
Anyone up to speed on the lifter issues? Crane has a good lifter but may have wrong cup size for a Rover push rod?? |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
Pretty likely, all lifters you find are actually for sbc.,(lube throught the lifter/push rod). IMHO, I would upgrade to aftermarket tubular push rods. I like oiling from both directions, as long as push rod has a "restrictor hole ? Cheers, roverman.
|
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4577 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
I started out with fancy Kenne Bell lifters... but removed them almost immediately because one of the 16 was defective. I've used regular lifters - whatever my local NAPA had in stock for Buick 215 - ever since. Stock pushrods. Sometimes fancy aftermarket parts are an invitation to trouble despite their premium price.
|
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (4514 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB Buick 215 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
|
en ian jenkins Mississauga Ont canada (67 posts) Registered: 12/27/2010 11:06AM Main British Car: 77 tr7 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
I've ordered a mild Isky cam with Crane lifters.
I'll see how the Rover push rods work with the Crane lifter As an aside, i'm supprised there aren't universal adjustable pushrods on the market. Something that is cut to length, insert end and away you go!! |
minorv8 Jukka Harkola (269 posts) Registered: 04/08/2009 06:50AM Main British Car: Morris Minor Rover V8 |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
I used Crane lifters for years with Rover pushrods and did not notice any problems. I still have Crane lifters but updated to Comp Cams pushrods.
I think that slan six mopar engine has tubular pushrods that can be shortened but I am not 100 % sure about it. I do have a set of adjustable pushrods (sold by Real Steel in UK) but I dont like the looks. Also, they adjustment requires space so I have never even trial fitted them. |
roverman Art Gertz Winchester, CA. (3188 posts) Registered: 04/24/2009 11:02AM Main British Car: 74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L |
Re: camshaft recommendations 3.5L rover
Clan, I used to buy TRW/etc. aftermarket, Bu V6, 3 pc pushrods, and shorten them to correct length. Chromemoly, at a good price. Cheers, roverman.
|
|