Engine and Transmission Tech

tips, technology, tools and techniques related to vehicle driveline components

Go to Thread: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicLog In


pspeaks
Paul Speaks
Dallas, Texas
(698 posts)

Registered:
07/20/2009 06:40PM

Main British Car:
1972 MGB-GT 1979 Ford 302

authors avatar
Waterless Coolant
Posted by: pspeaks
Date: February 08, 2014 07:07PM

Friends tell me waterless coolant has a much higher bowling point, creates less pressure if any at all, and is much better for aluminum components like heads, intakes, and water pumps, but at $40 a gallon I thought I'd ask, has anyone tried it, and if so did it make difference?


Paul


Moderator
Curtis Jacobson
Portland Oregon
(4577 posts)

Registered:
10/12/2007 02:16AM

Main British Car:
71 MGBGT, Buick 215

authors avatar
Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: Moderator
Date: February 08, 2014 08:15PM

It might be wonderful, but I can think of a lot of places I'd rather spend extra money.

Note: Evans NPG was discussed here... [forum.britishv8.org]


88v8
Ivor Duarte
Gloucestershire UK
(1041 posts)

Registered:
02/11/2010 04:29AM

Main British Car:
1974 Land Rover Lightweight V8

Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: 88v8
Date: February 09, 2014 04:23AM

I used Forlife for a while, perceived no difference on the gauge.
And there are practical issues if one actually drives the car ... sometimes one needs a top-up, there is no chance of buying any in general parts stores so one has to contaminate it with water or conventional anti-freeze, or carry one's own supply around in already inadequate luggage space.

Decided it was not worth the bother.

Ivor


302GT
Larry Shimp

(241 posts)

Registered:
11/17/2007 01:13PM

Main British Car:
1968 MGB GT Ford 302 crate engine

authors avatar
Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: 302GT
Date: February 09, 2014 02:16PM

I have heard that if the cooling system is not absolutely clean before this coolant is installed that severe overheating can occur. There have been some horror stories published. Even if such events are rare, it seems that this is an unnecessary risk.


burner1
Gary W

(212 posts)

Registered:
09/24/2011 09:59AM

Main British Car:


Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: burner1
Date: February 10, 2014 11:53AM

I have used it. I have seen people use it when they could not get a head gasket to seal on HP cars.
It is good for controlling hot spots on radical engines. Hot spots created when part of the water oils and creates a vapor boundary in the head.

However
It does not cool as well as a traditional coolant mix
If you need to add coolant on the road unless you have the proper alternative you will ruin the coolant you have
Any maintenance work requires the expensive stuff removed and saved; which I have had to do a couple times.
It is flammable as an example, a well known salt racer burned by it.

I returned my car to traditional coolant. If you have a problem with your engine it is typically a better solution to fix the problem.


perrymgbv8
Perry Stephenson

(188 posts)

Registered:
12/06/2007 02:50PM

Main British Car:


Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: perrymgbv8
Date: March 21, 2014 07:08PM

$40 a gallon !!

Its $104 a gallon in the UK :(


I use Evans Waterless in my engine. But not to help or hide any issues with poor cooling. Its purely to reduce cooling system pressure.

The best coolant of course is just plain water. But that develops pressure.

My engine runs around 60C just before I race. And 9 seconds later the gauge reads 95-100C as I cross the finish line. But the system pressure is 0psi :)

My engine is very clean and by the time I have slowed for the exit gate its back to 80C which is fine.

I have removed the filler cap at 95C and there is no pressure in the system apart from a tiny puff of air pressure that is from the air gap in my expansion tank. Having said the above, the coolant does need some TLC if you remove it from the engine as you need to drain it and store it in an air tight container. Even with 3-4% water in the coolant it still makes less pressure at high temps than conventional water / antifreeze mix does. The last thing I want is a blown hose on the drag strip.

Waterless coolant will however find small leaks on a system that previously did not leak on a 50/50 water- glycol mix.

After discussions with Evans I was happy to use the coolant to meet my personal needs of low system pressure when racing.

If you have an engine with choked water ways this stuff should theroetically aid cooling as it will make surface contact with hot spots that would normally see a conventional water / glycol mix developing excess nucleate boiling and vapour locks in hot spot areas as will not flash off on hot spots like this. I guess this could lead to higher temp gauge readings or radiator temps on a choked system. This just means its sucking more heat out of the engine I guess?

If your cooling system is fouled, this stuff is just a band aid to mask a fault. If your cooling system if clean it works very well to cool and keep system pressure at almost 0 psi.

Some UK engine builders have stated that they will not give any warrenty on engines they build if the client decides to use waterless coolant ? These are specifically engine builders that remanufacture 4 cylinder MGB engines which are prone to cooling system fouling. ??

I like the coolant because it does what I want for my particular application !


limey222
Michael Cubbon
Portland, OR
(129 posts)

Registered:
08/01/2015 12:55PM

Main British Car:
1969 MGB GM 3.4L V6

Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: limey222
Date: August 12, 2015 09:51PM

I ran it for a year in my 1969 MGB that had a German Ford 2.8 V6 motor. Never had any problems. I've just fitted a partially-rebuilt 93-95 GM 3.4 V6 and have filled the system with Evans Prep in preparation for changing over to their waterless coolant after a few hours running time. I have lots of Aluminum components in my cooling system that I want to protect and I really like the zero pressure condition, completely eliminates leaks and burst hoses. I just carry an additional gallon of Evans in my trunk "just in case".



BlownMGB-V8
Jim Blackwood
9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042
(6470 posts)

Registered:
10/23/2007 12:59PM

Main British Car:
1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS

authors avatar
Re: Waterless Coolant
Posted by: BlownMGB-V8
Date: August 13, 2015 11:36AM

If you plan to run this you should probably make sure your radiator is a bit oversized. In planning for my intercooler I investigated many potential coolant liquids. The main characteristic I looked at was the "heat of evaporation" (let's call this "HE") and also boiling point. Where the value for water was over 2000 (from memory you understand) the nearest other usable fluid was half that.

The takeaway from this exercise was that water is twice as efficient at absorbing heat as any other available fluid. My final choice was a mix of hydrocarbons with about 50% Pentane but this would be unsuitable for engine cooling due to the low boiling point. However, as the elements get heavier their HE tends to go up so it might be possible to find a light oil that approaches water. Feel free to look for one and here's a link to get you started:
[en.wikipedia.org]

But also be aware that hydrocarbons are flammable and fluids other than water or hydrocarbon based such as hydroflorides (freon) tend to be poisonous or have other bad qualities. Really, there is no perfect coolant.

Jim


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.