Engine and Transmission Tech
tips, technology, tools and techniques related to vehicle driveline components
|
rkas3882 randy kassed (84 posts) Registered: 05/30/2010 09:14AM Main British Car: 1973 mgb gt rover 3.5 |
Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
I have bought Bill's 4 link and I have a ford 8.8 rear....problem is the supplied u bolts won't fit and the 3" u bolts that fit the 8.8 are spaced too wide and are too thick to fit into the bolt pattern in Bill's kit. What did you guys do who are using an 8.8?
|
|
psmg Paul Schils Fredonia, WI (89 posts) Registered: 12/13/2007 10:27AM Main British Car: 1973 MGB-GT, Buick 215 1971 MGB RD, SBF 302 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Randy, Why don't you call Bill, he's always available and more than willing to help.
|
|
|
ex-tyke Graham Creswick Chatham, Ontario, Canada (1165 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 11:17AM Main British Car: 1976 MGB Ford 302 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Quote: Mine was one of the earliest kits purchased from Bill - all design shortcomings/installation issues were reported back to Bill for design improvements and manufacturing changes. When I reported that the 8.8 housing diameter required larger u-bolts and corrected hole spacing, it was agreed that the best approach was to provide parts specific for a customers axle (of course, the customer has to advise axle choice) ....not sure if Bill followed through with this idea, though!. In my case, a just slotted the existing holes in the top plate to accomodate locally purchased u bolts for the 8.8. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2015 09:40AM by ex-tyke. |
|
rkas3882 randy kassed (84 posts) Registered: 05/30/2010 09:14AM Main British Car: 1973 mgb gt rover 3.5 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Well, my 8.8 has 3 1/4" axle tubes, in order to fit u bolts of the appropriate size I had to slot the holes right out of the mounting pads. I don't really care for the way it is now and may get rid of the u bolts entirely and just weld the brackets to the axle eventually. One thing I noticed is that the bushings seem to have a lot of give when throttle is applied, everything is right. The angle of the front of the brackets where the shocks mount seems that it should be level with weight on the axle, they are still angled up by a large degree. I'll take some pics. It's angled up enough that trying to use the bottom hole for mounting the shock causes the bracket to be touching the shock.
|
|
|
|
mowog1 Rick Ingram Central Illinois (1523 posts) Registered: 10/17/2007 09:36PM Main British Car: 1974.5 MGB/GT 3.9l Rover |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Mine is the same, Randy....and I agree...the shock mount should be level, but is not. I have a Ford 8" differential.
This kit was also one of the first that Bill produced. I found that the top link on the RH side fouled on the battery box of a rubber bumpered car (as did Graham). Simple fix, though. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/19/2015 06:23AM by mowog1. |
|
ex-tyke Graham Creswick Chatham, Ontario, Canada (1165 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 11:17AM Main British Car: 1976 MGB Ford 302 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Quote:The angle of the bottom shock fastener is definitely not perpendicular to the shock body. It’s one of those little things that prompted me to make my own complete set of new brackets this Winter. In addition to correcting the shock bolt angle, I relocated the rear lower link attachment hole to allow levelling the link (parallel to road), eliminated the lowest shock attachment holes (not required for my chassis height) and thickened up on the u-bolt plate (to prevent plate deformation on tightening u-bolts) Have put 1000 miles on them so far this year and all is well! |
|
|
|
rkas3882 randy kassed (84 posts) Registered: 05/30/2010 09:14AM Main British Car: 1973 mgb gt rover 3.5 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
I think I will have to remakes lower brackets also, had I known I would have made my own 4 link kit like I was planning to do. I gannet gotten my car aligned on a rack yet but it seems that there is a bit of rear end movement with those bushings on/off throttle. I had some anti tramp bars under my leaf springs that I had made and I used rod ends. This may have something to do with why there seems to be so much movement now, it was solid before. It does bother me that the shock mount is at such an angle and I cannot use the lower shock mount. Has anyone upgraded their shocks? Much difference? Any other changes made to Bills set up?
|
|
JWD Jim Durham Gig Harbor, Wa. (103 posts) Registered: 01/22/2013 11:43AM Main British Car: 1980 MGB Ford 302 (398.9 HP, 383.2 TQ) |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Carl said - "It looks like that lower shock bracket was intended to be rotated back more on the housing."
That is exactly how it is designed to be installed. I assembled everything loosely, adjusted the rear for the correct pinion angle and positioned the brackets so the shock mount was perpendicular and the lower links are parallel to the ground before welding anything up. You can see that everything is level and correct and that the axle bracket is rotated down on the housing. |
|
JWD Jim Durham Gig Harbor, Wa. (103 posts) Registered: 01/22/2013 11:43AM Main British Car: 1980 MGB Ford 302 (398.9 HP, 383.2 TQ) |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Rick said "The spring perch prevented a horizontal positioning of the shock mount to the world."
The spring perch has to be re-positioned/rotated to the rear in order for everything to work properly. Using a spring perch that is welded to the bottom of the housing, parallel to the ground will cause the problems noted above. It's easier to move the perches than make new brackets. |
|
|
|
mstemp Mike Stemp Calgary, Canada (223 posts) Registered: 11/25/2009 07:18AM Main British Car: 1980 MGB Rover 4.6L |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Having still not installed my kit, it looks like the bottom brackets were welded incorrectly then. Has anyone pointed this out to Bill?
Those that are making a new diff can do as Jim did, weld spring perches after lining everything up first. |
|
rkas3882 randy kassed (84 posts) Registered: 05/30/2010 09:14AM Main British Car: 1973 mgb gt rover 3.5 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Well, that's the problem, when I had my 8.8 built the perches were welded so that when they are level with the ground the pinion angle would be correct. It seems that the brackets made by bill have too much angle where the shock mounts. I am the the only one that run into this apparently...I thought the mg axle was the same, the perches parallel to the ground and about 1.5-3 degrees up, or whatever that may be. Sent the perches supposed to be parallel to the ground with correct pinion angle? I set the pinion angle and ended up with the lower brackets on too much of an angle.
|
|
mgb260 Jim Nichols Sequim,WA (2463 posts) Registered: 02/29/2008 08:29PM Main British Car: 1973 MGB roadster 260 Ford V8 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Randy, The stock MGB axle is 5 to 6 degree up on the pinion. You can get angle shims or rotate the mount to level.
|
|
ex-tyke Graham Creswick Chatham, Ontario, Canada (1165 posts) Registered: 10/25/2007 11:17AM Main British Car: 1976 MGB Ford 302 |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Quote: When adding the spring perches to my newly shortened 8.8, I welded the perches on at the same angle as the stock MG axle....after all I kept the stock leaf springs at that time. With all due respect to Bill's design of the 4-link, customers perch angles are not going to match and his lower link bracket can't be expected to be correct for all! Leaving the bottom shock bolt askew didn't seem to compromise the installation in my case ...or you could use wedge shims as suggested. |
|
|
|
mstemp Mike Stemp Calgary, Canada (223 posts) Registered: 11/25/2009 07:18AM Main British Car: 1980 MGB Rover 4.6L |
Re: Classic conversions 4 link with 8.8
Graham,
Agreed but if the perches are all installed for 5-6 Deg of pinion angle, the brackets should line up correctly. Looking at the attached photo taken from the British V8 article, Bills test mule looks off as well. As you stated it most likely causes no issues in operation but could be easily fixed by Bill on subsequent manufacturing batches. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/22/2015 11:14AM by mstemp. |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
British V8 Home Page
Photo Gallery
Web Forum
Annual Meetings
Contact Info
Site Map
British Race Car
© 2019 British V8™ All rights reserved. Website & graphic design by:
Curtis Jacobson.
BritishV8 Forum is hosted by
SiteWelder LLC,
and is powered by a
Phorum engine.