|
galotis George Van Horn Collegeville, Pa (35 posts) Registered: 05/13/2014 05:40PM Main British Car: 1980 MGB 1.9L Supercharged, Microsquirt EFI, ESDI. |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Need some info, I have seen in Jim Stuart's photo's and write up that he is using a serpentine belt. the question is how much of a difference is there between the 3.9 and 4.0 front cover. my front pulley is 5 in from block to outside edge. that doesn't appear to be enough room to mount an alternator. So any one got a good photo of a set up or know what will work?
|
ptschram PT Schram Churubusco, IN (6 posts) Registered: 11/24/2013 05:32AM Main British Car: '67 through 2001 Land Rovers. |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Late 3.9 front covers are identical to the 4.0 in Discoveries.
'94/'95 Discos and '95 RRCs with 3.9s and 4.2s used the same front cover. The dimensions are identical to those used in Discos through 99-1/2 (GEMS EMS). The earlier engines with the distributor driven oil pumps had shorter crankshafts than those with the crank-driven oil pumps. All of the Rover V8s had the alternators mounted up high |
MrNick Nickolas Beckius Colorado Springs, CO (30 posts) Registered: 11/10/2009 03:14PM Main British Car: 1975 MGB 4.6L Rover V8 |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Very interested in this thread since it's the same kind of build I'm doing. 4.6L GEMS, GM T5 and converting to megasquirt 3.
Keep us updated! |
rkas3882 randy kassed (84 posts) Registered: 05/30/2010 09:14AM Main British Car: 1973 mgb gt rover 3.5 |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Jim, he put the Serp belt assembly in his maroon roadster, he also had the yellow gt. I talked to him a while back, I believe he sold both cars but could be wrong.
|
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (4512 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB Buick 215 |
Re: Rover 4.0 project restart after 3 years
Quote: Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 06/06/2018 10:38AM by MGBV8. |
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (4512 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB Buick 215 |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Quote: |
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (4512 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB Buick 215 |
Re: Rover 4.0 project restart after 3 years
Threads are now merged (in a funky manner), George.
It would be helpful to know what front cover you are using. |
galotis George Van Horn Collegeville, Pa (35 posts) Registered: 05/13/2014 05:40PM Main British Car: 1980 MGB 1.9L Supercharged, Microsquirt EFI, ESDI. |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
Carl, the present front cover is the original that was on the 4.0 motor when pulled out of the range rover. I know the plenum cover is a 3.9, I am using that to clear the hood, the 4.0 cover is flat and wont clear with out milling more off then reasonable.
It is a 4 bolt main. I would like to keep the original cover only due to the cam sensor is in it, and I need a cam sensor for sequential injection. If there is a better cover that also has a provision for a cam sensor and better clearance for oil ports then that would be ideal. I looked at the one from John Eales, not sure if I can tap it for a cam sensor, anyone know? Thanks for merging the two treads. |
|
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6470 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
George, I think you should stay with the newer front cover if you can. Probably it can be modified if needed. The water pump can be driven by either side of a serpentine belt so the serp belt can be used with either late or early covers.
Now the old style cover can also be used. For instance, on my 340 I have a VR pickup mounted in an aluminum block that bolts on with the old fuel pump bolts. The trigger wheel is a row of 1/4" holes drilled in the lower pulley. With your flywheel trigger you wouldn't need that. The cam sensor goes in the distributor hole and drives the oil pump. I modded a distributor to make one but you can use one from a Buick V6. Not cheap, though maybe you could find a better price: [www.amazon.com] Jim |
DiDueColpi Fred Key West coast - Canada (1365 posts) Registered: 05/14/2010 03:06AM Main British Car: I really thought that I'd be an action figure by now! |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
All you need is a single pulse per cam revolution George.
That means that any of the covers can be modified easily to accommodate that. So pick a cover that works for your oiling and cooling and worry about the pickup after. You could modify an old distributor with an old cover like Jim did. Utilize a newer cover with the sensor already built in. Build a wheel for the cam gear or drill it for a single pin and set up the Eales cover to read it. The fuel pump cam is fair game as well.You could even drill a valve cover and mount a sensor to read a single rocker. The megasquirt will accommodate pretty much any signal that you give it as long as its only once per cam revolution. The only caveat is don't have the crank sensor missing tooth and the cam pulse line up together. This can cause sync. errors. I've never experienced the problem but I hear that it happens. live like you mean it Fred |
RDMG Dave R Northern Virginia (138 posts) Registered: 04/07/2016 08:29PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB 4.6L Rover V8 |
Re: Rover 4.0 & Megasquirt
I’m working a similar build, only much more slowly. I think you’re already a bit ahead!
I test fitted my 4.6 with T5 trans, and I concluded the stock front cover would fit. The latest style cover wasn’t as thick as the interim style that still had casting dimensions for a distributor, so the water pump sits a bit closer in. The challenge is the oil filter. You can take off the factory 70-degree elbow and fit a remote filter cap, I think/hope. It will be very close. |