flitner John Fenner Miami Fl (168 posts) Registered: 03/11/2010 10:58AM Main British Car: 1972 MGB 350 CHEVY |
Master cylinder preference?
I've seen this used on a couple of builds and they look nice when set up with the booster turned 90*
[www.summitracing.com] However does this one pose a problem? It shows the same mounting flange and has a 1." bore with a one piece reservoir and if I see it correctly it also has dual circuit and more than half the price of the other. [www.summitracing.com] Again, your Input is greatly appreciated and respected!!! John Edited the first link, as it was not the unit I was meaning to post Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/11/2010 12:20AM by flitner. |
bsa_m21 Martin Rothman Vancouver, Canada (216 posts) Registered: 01/06/2009 11:41AM Main British Car: 1980 TR7V8 Rover 3.9L |
Re: Master cylinder preference?
Actually, they are both single circuit.
What you want is either of these styles: [www.wilwood.com] [www.wilwood.com] I replaced the MC on my '52 LandRover with the Wilwood MC in your first link. Better brakes than it's ever had before! Regards, M. |
flitner John Fenner Miami Fl (168 posts) Registered: 03/11/2010 10:58AM Main British Car: 1972 MGB 350 CHEVY |
Re: Master cylinder preference?
Oh Yes you are right they are!
I posted the correct one that I had been looking at before from a build on here that is the same as the second link in your reply, the first one I dont think will mate to a MGB booster with 2.250 stud c/l. Thanks! |