Mustang II suspension on an LBC ?
Not saying you should BUT maybe worth a look ? Is it worth sll the work ? Do you want up to 13" disk and Corvette stye C7 hubs ?
All these crossmembers and aftermarket componets are so cheap now, nod to China. All well and fine but what about geometry ? Plenty of DIY videos on how to install. Precious little about anti-dive, roll-caster gain, correct Ackerman or trailing the upper/lower for improved ride quality. It's easier to make arm pivots,.parallel to chassis centerline but not best for ride smootness Onward, Art. |
Re: Mustang II suspension on an LBC ?
Any front steer cars out there? What is your Akerman ? Mustang II appears to be about 100%, anti-Akerman,(steering arm centerline, front/back, aligns with King pin/ ball joints centerline). This means excessive tire scrub in turns and poor turn-in properties.
It appears difficult to achieve full Akerman with a 13" rotor. Let's not drift in the wrong direction, Art. |
Roverbeam Chad McNeely N.E. MO (78 posts) Registered: 06/09/2021 06:03PM Main British Car: Alpine S4 Rover 4.0 |
Re: Mustang II suspension on an LBC ?
I got the impression Mut2 was a get-it-done suspension for the engine swap crowd, where the emphasis was on the engine and maybe strength, not necessarily making the car handle differently/better.
I went with (narrowed) Miata, since they’ve got a great handling reputation, and I didn’t want to fab the whole thing from scratch. While I’d enjoy the deep dive into vehicle kinematics, I’ve got enough going on not to want to add that rabbit hole to my project. |
MGBV8 Carl Floyd Kingsport, TN (4554 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 11:32PM Main British Car: 1979 MGB Buick 215 |
Re: Mustang II suspension on an LBC ?
The MGB front suspension is quite good, even by today's standards.
What they call Mustang II front suspension these days is an evolution sharing no parts of the original design. |