MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Hello All,
I have been doing more modifications to my 4.8L MGB GT V8, Road and trackday car. I couldnt find any details of someone adding a fully functional rear wing to an MGB in the net so have just jumped in at the deep end with my design. Here are some photos would appreciate some feedback as to what you guys think. So far have only driven on the highway upto about 80mph and it seems very stable. I now need to try it on track. To complement the wing I am also fitting a front splitter that will extend back as far as the front crossmember. Cheers Mark |
Jim Stabe Jim Stabe San Diego, Ca (829 posts) Registered: 02/28/2009 10:01AM Main British Car: 1966 MGB Roadster 350 LT1 Chevy |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Whether it works or not, it looks mean. You should contact Jim Blackwood, he has a wing on the back of his car but his is a roadster. As thorough as Jim is I'm sure he has lots of data on his wing.
|
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4577 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
I always enjoy seeing photos of your car! (We need to get your page of the Photo Gallery updated to show your work properly.)
I'm enthusiastic about your idea of adding a splitter. The benefit should be substantial. Will you use it around town, or just for track days? If it's strictly for track days, maybe you can set it lower and extend it outward to front and sides further. There are two winged MGBs on this site: Jim Blackwood's MGB and Phil's Leonard's RV8 racecar. I don't recall seeing any measurements of how well those wings work. It would be very interesting to put load cells under the mounts to see how much downforce is created. Of course lap times are the real measure of success. Please keep us posted as you evaluate these concepts! |
Preform Resources Dave Craddock Redford,Michigan (359 posts) Registered: 12/20/2008 05:46PM Main British Car: 72 MGB V6 3.4 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
The larger the front splitter, the more wing you will need to balance the car out, the more angle of attack the more drag,
it's a tradeoff. Dave |
Bill Young Bill Young Kansas City, MO (1337 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 09:23AM Main British Car: '73 MG Midget V6 , '59 MGA I6 2.8 GM, 4.0 Jeep |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
The last couple of races we've been running Phil's RV8 without the wing and doing quite well. We may need the additional downforce with a stronger engine, but for now it's pretty well balanced as it is without.
|
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Thanks guys, I am really looking forward to experimenting with the new setup. Anyone who has seen my videos on youtube (v8bloke) will see that I have always been battling with oversteer so I am hoping the wing will help reduce this.
It will also be interesting to see how much straight line speed will be reduced by the extra drag. To try and see what the airflow is doing I am going to attach some 5ft lengths of thin fabric ribbon to the top of the windscreen so they trail back over/under the wing. Then using my Gopro and suction mount attached to the roof drive at varying speeds to film how the ribbons trail. Dont know if it will work but worth a try! Next trackday is on the Silverstone GP track on 2nd Sept so will post the findings. Cheers Mark |
DC Townsend David Townsend Vermont (406 posts) Registered: 11/21/2007 12:22PM Main British Car: '78 B (almost done) 30-over SBF, dry sump |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
You might also take a look at Mike Sawatsky's (spelling?) heavily modified BGT track only car. He's running both a splitter and a wing and has been very detailed in his experiments with both. He has several threads on this board and at least one over on BritishV8. Might be worth a look.
|
|
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4577 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
|
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
I had thought about testing different aerodynamic effects such as this. It would be real easy to hook p a potentiometer to measure suspension deflection at speed. You could run with and without and measure how much the suspension changes with each.
|
Preform Resources Dave Craddock Redford,Michigan (359 posts) Registered: 12/20/2008 05:46PM Main British Car: 72 MGB V6 3.4 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
mark,the tuft testing should be very revealing if you can get adequate pics ,can you move the wing up and down ? then you can
see where it is most effective without running the wing at a severe angle of attack (AOA) minimizing drag, also you can see the effect of downwash off the back of the wing. If you run a front splitter with the flat bottom going back as far as poss. it WILL create down force, contributing to the already poor weight distrbution and if you run the wing at an exagerated AOA you will get the resultant drag,, maybe just try a few tricks with the rear wing and your existing front air dam, see how that feels,of that and as Gary says with the capability to measure true deflection would be the icing on the cake. Dave |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
With the Arduino it would be very easy to hook up an LCD and a potentiometer (and a whole lot more).
[arduino.cc] [www.arduino.cc] |
Moderator Curtis Jacobson Portland Oregon (4577 posts) Registered: 10/12/2007 02:16AM Main British Car: 71 MGBGT, Buick 215 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Quote: Mine measures about 49/51... Mark's can't be too far off that. Is that poor? What's the target then? |
Preform Resources Dave Craddock Redford,Michigan (359 posts) Registered: 12/20/2008 05:46PM Main British Car: 72 MGB V6 3.4 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Those ARE good numbers, better than I thought,(obviously) the other, generally still applies however.
Dave |
|
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
50 / 50 weight distribution is the optimal split for a front engine - rear drive car. it's not unusual for FWD cars to be over 60% on the front axle ... but then, their rear tires aren't doing a whole heck of a lot.
mine is 52/48 F/R i thought that was quite good. and it IS pretty good. anything better than 55 / 45 is getting towards purpose built race car territory. it's normally kind of hard to get that much balance out of most cars because there's often a significant portion of the engine which sits forward of the center line of the front suspension. Here are some photos would appreciate some feedback as to what you guys think. you remember the Dodge Daytona / Plymouth Roadrunner from 1970? it became somewhat of an "open secret" ( because the design got outlawed, so the engineer and aero guys didn't mind talking about it ) that the designers considered the UPRIGHTS to be almost more important than the wing itself. they acted as high speed stabilizers, just like you see on an airplane. you can see some vestiges of this thought process on Cup cars today with the 'shark fin' that runs down the drivers side of the car.. as such, if you spend much time over 100mph you may want to consider full body uprights rather than those weight savers you're running now. |
BlownMGB-V8 Jim Blackwood 9406 Gunpowder Rd., Florence, KY 41042 (6470 posts) Registered: 10/23/2007 12:59PM Main British Car: 1971 MGB Blown,Injected,Intercooled Buick 340/AA80E/JagIRS |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Aircraft Spruce and Specialty sells airfoil shaped aluminum struts. That is what I used.
Jim |
Preform Resources Dave Craddock Redford,Michigan (359 posts) Registered: 12/20/2008 05:46PM Main British Car: 72 MGB V6 3.4 |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
The cup cars are using this splitter effect trying which keep the air flow on the sides or deck,, the sharp edges create vortices which aid in that effect.
Dave |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
The new wing and splitter have had their first test.
Definateley reduced oversteer in fast turns. [www.youtube.com] |
Re: MGB Aerodynamics. Will this work?
Heh. I do believe I see a spinner at 1:10.
That's amazing how you're *murdering* that Evo in the corners. Is he running stock rubber? It sounded like you're geared just a little short for the front stretch on that one dry pass near the end when you were pursuing. You ditch your passenger and I'm sure that will come into play a lot more often. |