Engine and Transmission Tech

tips, technology, tools and techniques related to vehicle driveline components

Go to Thread: PreviousNext
Go to: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicLog In
Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2


Wildcat
Rik Hofste

(19 posts)

Registered:
10/21/2013 01:28AM

Main British Car:


Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Wildcat
Date: November 02, 2013 06:21AM

Hi Dan,

Thanks and PM send.

Cheers
Rik


roverman
Art Gertz
Winchester, CA.
(3188 posts)

Registered:
04/24/2009 11:02AM

Main British Car:
74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: roverman
Date: November 04, 2013 11:55AM

Dan, HR is computed with a .700" roller dia. ? Base circle of cam is ? By 2.57 ramp rate, means .00257" lifter rise, per 1 deg. cam rotation ? Thanks, roverman.


Dan Jones
Dan Jones
St. Louis, Missouri
(280 posts)

Registered:
07/21/2008 03:32PM

Main British Car:
1980 Triumph TR8 3.5L Rover V8

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Dan Jones
Date: November 18, 2013 04:58PM

> Dan, HR is computed with a .700" roller dia. ? Base circle of cam is ?

Roller diameter is not required for the initial design. When you cross it
against a specific lobe catalog, the roller diameter is required. The base
circles in the catalogs are usually reflective of SBC or SBF but vary when
applied to Buick base circle. Woody sent three different lobes and the
base circle of each was different.

> By 2.57 ramp rate, means .00257" lifter rise, per 1 deg. cam rotation ?

That's my guess but I've never tried to check the units. No units are given
in the documentation. The scale is listed as:

1.00 Very Low Acceleration, Mild Street, Extended Valvetrain Life
2.00 Stock Production, OEM Camshafts
3.00 Performance OEM and Aftermarket Street Performance
4.00 Drag and Oval Track Racing, Limited Street
5.00 All-Out Racing, Very High Valvetrain Acceleration
6.00 Maximum Drag Racing, Limited Valvetrain Life
7.00 Extreme And Experimental

Dan Jones


roverman
Art Gertz
Winchester, CA.
(3188 posts)

Registered:
04/24/2009 11:02AM

Main British Car:
74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: roverman
Date: November 18, 2013 07:16PM

Clan. Steve Smith Racing Cams, says .009-.010" lift per 1 cam deg., is fairly common, for a mech. roller cam. Cheers, roverman.


Wildcat
Rik Hofste

(19 posts)

Registered:
10/21/2013 01:28AM

Main British Car:


Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Wildcat
Date: November 19, 2013 02:52PM

The blank rollers from Woody are with .550" lobes, LSA of 110 which can be changed + or - 2 degrees.

Cheers Rik


roverman
Art Gertz
Winchester, CA.
(3188 posts)

Registered:
04/24/2009 11:02AM

Main British Car:
74' Jensen Healy, 79 Huff. GT 1, 74 MGB Lotus 907,2L

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: roverman
Date: November 19, 2013 06:52PM

Rik, Can you post a picture of that lobe. .550" is HUGE, for such a small base circle. My most radical lobes are .400" max. Cheers, roverman.


Dan Jones
Dan Jones
St. Louis, Missouri
(280 posts)

Registered:
07/21/2008 03:32PM

Main British Car:
1980 Triumph TR8 3.5L Rover V8

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Dan Jones
Date: November 19, 2013 09:19PM

Art,

0.550" is at the valve, assuming a 1.6:1 rocker ratio. Uncut lobe lift is 0.550"/1.6=0.34375".

Dan Jones



Wildcat
Rik Hofste

(19 posts)

Registered:
10/21/2013 01:28AM

Main British Car:


Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Wildcat
Date: November 20, 2013 01:20AM

Art,

Dan is correct, sorry for the confusion.

Rik


ghornbostel
Greg Hornbostel
Nebraska
(76 posts)

Registered:
09/02/2013 01:41PM

Main British Car:
1957 TR3 Buick 231 evenfire V6

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: ghornbostel
Date: December 05, 2013 01:28PM

So my fault for not paying attention to this post before I bought a cam for my 231 Buick evenfire. Its a Crower, 235*/242*duration, .483"/,486" lift and 107* lsa. Its a mechanical lifter cam and I have a Inglese 2-3c IDA Weber induction system and non- tuned length headers. The heads are late model evenfire and basically stock. Do I even think about installing this cam or should I look for something closer to 112* lsa. I like mechanical lifters and after looking around would probably have to have a custom grind to get mechanical lifter profile or can I run mechanical lifters on a hydraulic profile which all seem to have greater lsa. Hate to tap into a great data base oriented around very high performance for a engine that I want to have a modicum of performance and a wow factor when I raise the hood of the old TR3.
Regards
Greg Hornbostel


Wildcat
Rik Hofste

(19 posts)

Registered:
10/21/2013 01:28AM

Main British Car:


Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: Wildcat
Date: December 06, 2013 03:27AM

Greg,

It's not wise to run a mechanical lifter on a hydraulic profiled cam, lobes are different and you will run into trouble.
Overlap of the Cowler is about 70 degrees so you should be able to run the cam with LSA 107.
Inglese is advising to use a cam with a wide, LSA 112 or higher with minimal overlap with their Weber induction.
This is to avoid reversion through the carb when both intake and inlet valves are open.
When installing my first Weber 8-stack on a RV8, the installed cam had 104 LSA and it had still a good idle at 800 rpm and no problems when cruising around, although probably not the best cam for this induction system...
Alternative would be to ask a cam company to grind a mechanical can with a wider LSA.

Cheers
Rik


ghornbostel
Greg Hornbostel
Nebraska
(76 posts)

Registered:
09/02/2013 01:41PM

Main British Car:
1957 TR3 Buick 231 evenfire V6

Re: Camshaft for quad twin Webers/Dellorto's
Posted by: ghornbostel
Date: December 06, 2013 10:37AM

Rik, thanks for the reply. To the people involved in this thread this must be a "want-a-be" situation as the car is nothing more than a cobbled together hot rod. I just didn't want to get into a impossible to drive/tune situation and have to pull the engine down shortly after I got it running. I installed the Webers last May and actually got them to what I considered acceptable tune. The performance was much better than the 2v carb and it was returning the same fuel economy. I will probably contact Crower again and opt for a custom grind as I don't want to listen to the occasional "one lifter clack" after a spirited run. Once again, sorry for the intrusion on this thread.

Regards
Greg
Goto Page: Previous12
Current Page: 2 of 2


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.